Loading…
Characterization of the murine leukemia virus protease and its comparison with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease
1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Hungary 2 HIV Drug Resistant Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, MD, USA 3 Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of general virology 2006-05, Vol.87 (5), p.1321-1330 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Hungary
2 HIV Drug Resistant Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, MD, USA
3 Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Correspondence József Tözsér tozser{at}indi.biochem.dote.hu
The protease (PR) of Murine leukemia virus (MLV) was expressed in Escherichia coli , purified to homogeneity and characterized by using various assay methods, including HPLC-based, photometric and fluorometric activity measurements. The specificity of the bacterially expressed PR was similar to that of virion-extracted PR. Compared with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) PR, the pH optimum of the MLV enzyme was higher. The specificity of the MLV PR was further compared with that of HIV-1 PR by using various oligopeptides representing naturally occurring cleavage sites in MLV and HIV-1, as well as by using bacterially expressed proteins having part of the MLV Gag. Inhibitors designed against HIV-1 PR were also active on MLV PR, although all of the tested ones were substantially less potent on this enzyme than on HIV-1 PR. Nevertheless, amprenavir, the most potent inhibitor against MLV PR, was also able to block Gag processing in MLV-infected cells. These results indicate that, in spite of the similar function in the life cycle of virus infection, the two PRs are only distantly related in their specificity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1317 1465-2099 |
DOI: | 10.1099/vir.0.81382-0 |