Loading…

Characterization of the murine leukemia virus protease and its comparison with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease

1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Hungary 2 HIV Drug Resistant Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, MD, USA 3 Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of general virology 2006-05, Vol.87 (5), p.1321-1330
Main Authors: Feher, Anita, Boross, Peter, Sperka, Tamas, Miklossy, Gabriella, Kadas, Janos, Bagossi, Peter, Oroszlan, Stephen, Weber, Irene T, Tozser, Jozsef
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Hungary 2 HIV Drug Resistant Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, MD, USA 3 Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA Correspondence József Tözsér tozser{at}indi.biochem.dote.hu The protease (PR) of Murine leukemia virus (MLV) was expressed in Escherichia coli , purified to homogeneity and characterized by using various assay methods, including HPLC-based, photometric and fluorometric activity measurements. The specificity of the bacterially expressed PR was similar to that of virion-extracted PR. Compared with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) PR, the pH optimum of the MLV enzyme was higher. The specificity of the MLV PR was further compared with that of HIV-1 PR by using various oligopeptides representing naturally occurring cleavage sites in MLV and HIV-1, as well as by using bacterially expressed proteins having part of the MLV Gag. Inhibitors designed against HIV-1 PR were also active on MLV PR, although all of the tested ones were substantially less potent on this enzyme than on HIV-1 PR. Nevertheless, amprenavir, the most potent inhibitor against MLV PR, was also able to block Gag processing in MLV-infected cells. These results indicate that, in spite of the similar function in the life cycle of virus infection, the two PRs are only distantly related in their specificity.
ISSN:0022-1317
1465-2099
DOI:10.1099/vir.0.81382-0