Loading…
Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development
2-[ 18 F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect. This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical cancer research 2005-04, Vol.11 (8), p.2785-2808 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | 2-[ 18 F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect.
This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in
certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely applied in oncology primarily as a staging and restaging tool that can guide patient
care. However, because it accurately detects recurrent or residual disease, FDG-PET also has significant potential for assessing
therapy response. In this regard, it can improve patient management by identifying responders early, before tumor size is
reduced; nonresponders could discontinue futile therapy. Moreover, a reduction in the FDG-PET signal within days or weeks
of initiating therapy (e.g., in lymphoma, non–small cell lung, and esophageal cancer) significantly correlates with prolonged
survival and other clinical end points now used in drug approvals. These findings suggest that FDG-PET could facilitate drug
development as an early surrogate of clinical benefit. This article reviews the scientific basis of FDG-PET and its development
and application as a valuable oncology imaging tool. Its potential to facilitate drug development in seven oncologic settings
(lung, lymphoma, breast, prostate, sarcoma, colorectal, and ovary) is addressed. Recommendations include initial validation
against approved therapies, retrospective analyses to define the magnitude of change indicative of response, further prospective
validation as a surrogate of clinical benefit, and application as a phase II/III trial end point to accelerate evaluation
and approval of novel regimens and therapies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2626 |