Loading…

Vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination and effect on Doppler measurements

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination, and to evaluate the effect on the blood flow of the uterine and umbilical arteries. Methods Forty-nine patients were randomized to receive either 200 μg of vaginal misopros...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2009-09, Vol.106 (3), p.250-253
Main Authors: Karsidag, A. Yasemin Karageyim, Buyukbayrak, Esra E., Kars, Bulent, Dansuk, Ramazan, Unal, Orhan, Turan, M. Cem
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination, and to evaluate the effect on the blood flow of the uterine and umbilical arteries. Methods Forty-nine patients were randomized to receive either 200 μg of vaginal misoprostol every 6 hours or 200 μg of misoprostol sublingually every 6 hours. Doppler velocimetry studies were assessed immediately before and 60 minutes after the administration of the first dose. Standard descriptive calculations, Mann–Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and χ2 tests were performed. Results The mean interval between induction and onset of active labor, induction and delivery, and the duration of oxytocin administration were significantly shorter in the sublingual misoprostol group. Both routes of administration increased the Doppler indices for the uterine arteries; however, misoprostol via the sublingual route did not affect the umbilical arteries. Conclusion Sublingual administration of misoprostol for second-trimester medical abortion results in a higher success rate and does not affect umbilical blood flow.
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.001