Loading…

Randomized trial of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in HIV-infected adult patients comparing a standard dose to a double dose

Because HIV and hepatitis B virus share many common risk factors, it is important to try to vaccinate HIV patients against hepatitis B. There are numerous reports describing a variety of dose schedules, limited success and markers associated with impaired response to HBV vaccine in these individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2005-04, Vol.23 (22), p.2902-2908
Main Authors: Fonseca, Marise Oliveira, Pang, Lorrin Wayie, Cavalheiro, Norma de Paula, Barone, Antônio Alci, Lopes, Marta Heloisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Because HIV and hepatitis B virus share many common risk factors, it is important to try to vaccinate HIV patients against hepatitis B. There are numerous reports describing a variety of dose schedules, limited success and markers associated with impaired response to HBV vaccine in these individuals. All studies have been small in size making it difficult to draw conclusions within and between studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a double dose of hepatitis B vaccine under more definitive guidelines: double blinded, randomized, controlled, with numbers for statistical validity. Two hundred and ten HIV infected subjects received a standard dose (20 μg) or a double dose (40 μg) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine IM 0, 1 and 6 months. Ninety-four receiving standard dose and 98 receiving double dose completed the study. The seroconversion rate (anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL) was 47 and 34% for double dose and standard dose, respectively ( p = 0.07). A statistically significant higher seroconversion rate was associated with double dose comparing with standard dose for patients with CD4 cell counts ≥350 cells/mm 3 (64.3% × 39.3%; p = 0.008) but made no difference to seroconversion in those with CD4
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.057