Loading…

The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: A study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability

Prospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of adult spinal deformity patients queried over a 12-month period. To assess the SRS-22 instrument compared with the SF-12 and Oswestry. Very few reports in the literature have applied the SRS-22 to adult spinal deformity patients. Consecutive adult spina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2005-02, Vol.30 (4), p.455-461
Main Authors: BRIDWELL, Keith H, CATS-BARIL, William, HARRAST, John, BERVEN, Sigurd, GLASSMAN, Steven, FARCY, Jean-Pierre, HORTON, William C, LENKE, Lawrence G, BALDUS, Christine, RADAKE, Terri
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Prospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of adult spinal deformity patients queried over a 12-month period. To assess the SRS-22 instrument compared with the SF-12 and Oswestry. Very few reports in the literature have applied the SRS-22 to adult spinal deformity patients. Consecutive adult spinal deformity patients were applied the SRS-22, SF-12, and Oswestry. Four analyses were done: 1) floor/ceiling effect; 2) Pearson's correlation coefficients between the SRS-22, SF-12, and Oswestry; 3) Cronbach's alpha analysis for internal consistency within the SRS-22; and 4) test/retest. Floor/ceiling range for the SRS-22 compared favorably with the SF-12 and Oswestry. The Pearson's coefficients correlating the two questionnaires relative to the SRS-22 were > 0.7. The Cronbach's alpha within each domain for the SRS-22 were > 0.7, except for pain (0.67). Test/retest correlation coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.95 for the subscales. The SRS-22 is a disease-specific instrument with the capacity to demonstrate change in health status more effectively than the SF-12 and in more domains than the Oswestry. The SRS-22 showed high criterion validity with the SF-12 and Oswestry based on Pearson's coefficients. High Cronbach's alpha scores suggested a high internal consistency within each domain of the SRS-22, except for pain (0.67). Test/retest reliability was excellent.
ISSN:0362-2436
1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/01.brs.0000153393.82368.6b