Loading…

Oral spray insulin in treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comparison of efficacy of the oral spray insulin (Oralin) with subcutaneous (SC) insulin injection, a proof of concept study

Objective Proof‐of‐concept study of evaluation of metabolic effect of novel oral spray insulin (Oralin) formulation at breakfast time in subjects with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily injections. Research design and methods This was an open‐label, crossover, randomized study in (n = 23) subjects wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 2004-11, Vol.20 (6), p.472-478
Main Authors: Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime, Guevara, Marco, Saavedra, Jeannette, Mihic, Marko, Modi, Pankaj
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Proof‐of‐concept study of evaluation of metabolic effect of novel oral spray insulin (Oralin) formulation at breakfast time in subjects with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily injections. Research design and methods This was an open‐label, crossover, randomized study in (n = 23) subjects with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily injections. Subjects received each treatment, in random order, 3 to 7 days apart—a daily dose of SC injection (0.1 u/kg) on one occasion and Oralin spray (100 u) at time 0 min on another occasion. Subjects were given a standard breakfast containing 360 cal (Sustacal liquid meal) 10 min after the dose. Blood samples were taken at regular intervals to measure glucose, insulin, and C‐peptide. Results The 30‐ and 60‐min postprandial glucose levels were significantly lowered with Oralin versus that with the injection treatment (146 ± 5 mg/dL Oralin vs 184 ± 7 mg/dL injection at 30 min and 192 ± 6 mg/dL Oralin vs 236 ± 9 mg/dL injection, p < 0.003 at 60 min). The rise in serum insulin levels was significantly higher (Cmax = 98 ± 6 uU/mL for Oralin at 30 min vs 65 ± 3 uU/ml injection, p < 0.001). The reduction in C‐peptide was greater in Oralin during the first 60 min (1.38 ± 0.21 ng/mL Oralin vs 1.75 ± 0.38 ng/mL injection, p < 0.001). Conclusions This proof‐of‐concept study results demonstrated that Oralin could be used as meal insulin in place of mealtime‐insulin injections in subjects with type 2 diabetes to regulate the postprandial glucose levels. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1520-7552
1520-7560
DOI:10.1002/dmrr.477