The Territorial Impact of the Farmers' Early Retirement Scheme

This article considers the causal relationships between the European farmers' early retirement policy instrument and structural and social outcomes. The member states of Greece, Ireland and France have been among the main beneficiaries of this policy scheme, which encourages farmers aged betwee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociologia ruralis 2007-07, Vol.47 (3), p.246-272
Main Author: Bika, Zografia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agrarian Structures
Early retirement
Europe
European policy
Family Farms
Family Policy
Farmers
Farms
Inheritance
Inheritances
Public policy
Regional analysis
Retirement
Rural and urban sociology
Rural areas
Rural sociology
Social organization
Social sciences
Sociology
Territory
Tradition
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article considers the causal relationships between the European farmers' early retirement policy instrument and structural and social outcomes. The member states of Greece, Ireland and France have been among the main beneficiaries of this policy scheme, which encourages farmers aged between 55 and 66 to retire and transfer their land to a younger farmer, with multiple effects. The analysis in this article suggests that the accrued pension income is mostly higher than applicants' previous earnings from farming, while the policy instrument is only moderately successful in enlarging farms or encouraging new entrants, with the majority of transfers occurring between members of the same family. The farmers' early retirement scheme appears to be connected more to the regional traditions of inheritance than to farm structures per se. The impact on an unbalanced European age–farmer structure is evaluated as differing little from what would have happened anyway, with only short‐term effects reported in relation to the time scale. In summary, the scheme is subject to manipulation in terms of region‐specific circumstances and thus fulfils social objectives rather than the purpose of structural cohesion.
ISSN:0038-0199
1467-9523
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00436.x