The Challenge of Farmland Preservation: Lessons from a Six-Nation Comparison

Countries differ significantly in their laws and policies for farmland preservation and in the degree of success achieved. This paper compares the policies of the U.S.A. and Canada-two countries with a high rate of farmland per person-with four other democracies on the other side of the Atlantic-Bri...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of the American Planning Association 1997-04, Vol.63 (2), p.220-243
Main Author:	Alterman, Rachelle
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Agricultural land Agricultural Policy Agriculture Canada Comparative analysis Comparative studies Comparative Study Conservation Crossnational studies Development Policy Environmental Protection Farm management Farming Farms Food Foreign Affairs France Great Britain Israel Land policy Land Use Manycountries Netherlands Planning methods Population density Preservation Production planning Studies Success United States of America
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Countries differ significantly in their laws and policies for farmland preservation and in the degree of success achieved. This paper compares the policies of the U.S.A. and Canada-two countries with a high rate of farmland per person-with four other democracies on the other side of the Atlantic-Britain, The Netherlands, France, and Israel. The policies of the European Community are also discussed. The paper develops a framework for cross-national comparison of institutional, policy, and contextual factors. The findings show that stringent legal controls are not enough, nor is there a strong correlation between degree of success in farmland preservation and any particular format for planning. The great successes of the Netherlands and Britain-among Europe's most densely inhabited countries-are attributable to other factors. Since farmland preservation is increasingly being challenged by a declining economic rationale and competing collective goals, and since the countries across the Atlantic have had to face these challenges earlier than North America has, unlocking the secrets of success and failure through cross-national comparisons can help American and Canadian planners prepare effectively to meet future challenges.
ISSN:	0194-4363 1939-0130