Counterframing Public Dissent: An Analysis of Antiwar Coverage in the U.S. Media

This research sought to determine how the U.S. news media reported on public dissent in the U.S./Iraq War campaign in the months surrounding the Congressional midterm elections of 2006. In total, 89 news stories of antiwar coverage from 11 national news sources were analyzed using mixed research met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical studies in media communication 2009-10, Vol.26 (4), p.331-350
Main Authors: Klein, Adam G., Byerly, Carolyn M., McEachern, Tony M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antiwar Movement
Congressional elections
Content Analysis
Dissent
Elections
Iraq
Iraq War
Iraq War-2003
Media
Media coverage
News
News Coverage
News Frames
News media
Political dissent
Political economy
Political-economy Analysis
Protest movements
United States of America
War
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This research sought to determine how the U.S. news media reported on public dissent in the U.S./Iraq War campaign in the months surrounding the Congressional midterm elections of 2006. In total, 89 news stories of antiwar coverage from 11 national news sources were analyzed using mixed research methods. The study found that news on Iraq War dissent was largely vocalized by public antiwar protestors and active military/war veterans. These war critics presented new counterframes to the original war story, which earlier research showed had been framed by the Bush administration. Counterframes collectively characterized the war story as "illegal," "immoral," and "based on lies." These public-driven messages also replaced the elite sourcing (of earlier coverage) with the views of non-elites, that is, ordinary citizens. Such counterframes emerged primarily through journalist-selected news quotes about the Iraq War that amplified themes of White House accountability.
ISSN:1529-5036
1479-5809
DOI:10.1080/15295030903176658