Three-Fifths a Racist: A Typology for Analyzing Public Opinion about Race

Is race politics primarily about symbolic racism, principled conservatism, or group conflict? After almost three decades, this debate among some of our best scholars seems scarcely closer to resolution, yet the theoretical, empirical, and normative issues at stake remain enormous. All three parties...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political behavior 2009-03, Vol.31 (1), p.31-51
Main Author: Neblo, Michael A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Affirmative action
African Americans
Conservatism
Liberalism
Native Americans
Original Paper
Political behavior
Political debate
Political Parties
Political psychology
Political Science
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Public Opinion
Race
Racial Relations
Racism
Sociology
Taxonomy
White people
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Is race politics primarily about symbolic racism, principled conservatism, or group conflict? After almost three decades, this debate among some of our best scholars seems scarcely closer to resolution, yet the theoretical, empirical, and normative issues at stake remain enormous. All three parties to the debate falsely assume that the causal structure driving opinion about race policy is homogenous. I reorient and advance the debate by showing how a methodological shift to a datadriven taxonomy of subjects can elucidate how race politics really is complex. I use this taxonomy to run new analyses, and to explain and assess the seemingly contradictory results of previous contributions to the debate. Each of the major parties to the debate is partially right in their account of public opinion about race politics, but about independently identifiable sub-sets of subjects.
ISSN:0190-9320
1573-6687
DOI:10.1007/s11109-008-9060-2