Access to written information for people with aphasia

Background : Accessibility is often constructed in terms of physical accessibility. There has been little research into how the environment can accommodate the communicative limitations of people with aphasia. Communication accessibility for people with aphasia is conceptualised in this paper within...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aphasiology 2005-10, Vol.19 (10-11), p.923-929
Main Authors: Worrall, Linda, Rose, Tanya, Howe, Tami, Brennan, Alison, Egan, Jennifer, Oxenham, Dorothea, McKenna, Kryss
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aphasia
Communication
Internet
Reading
Writing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background : Accessibility is often constructed in terms of physical accessibility. There has been little research into how the environment can accommodate the communicative limitations of people with aphasia. Communication accessibility for people with aphasia is conceptualised in this paper within the World Health Organisation's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The focus of accessibility is considered in terms of the relationship between the environment and the person with the disability. Aims : This paper synthesises the results of three studies that examine the effectiveness of aphasia-friendly written material. Main Contribution : The first study (Rose, Worrall, & McKenna, 2003) found that aphasia-friendly formatting of written health information improves comprehension by people with aphasia, but not everyone prefers aphasia-friendly formatting. Brennan, Worrall, and McKenna (in press) found that the aphasia-friendly strategy of augmenting text with pictures, particularly ClipArt and Internet images, may be distracting rather than helpful. Finally, Egan, Worrall, and Oxenham (2004) found that the use of an aphasia-friendly written training manual was instrumental in assisting people with aphasia to learn the Internet. Conclusion : Aphasia-friendly formatting appears to improve the accessibility of written material for people with aphasia. Caution is needed when considering the use of illustrations, particularly ClipArt and Internet images, when creating aphasia-friendly materials. A research, practice, and policy agenda for introducing aphasia-friendly formatting is proposed.
ISSN:0268-7038
1464-5041
DOI:10.1080/02687030544000137