Loading…
Urban CEO Superintendents’ Alternative Strategies in Reducing School Dropouts
The focus is on strategies used by 10 urban districts to reduce school dropouts. Thirty-eight strategies for dropout prevention were identified. Although the majority identified dropout prevention strategies, only two districts referred to “recovery programs.” If district spokespersons mentioned the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Education and urban society 2006-11, Vol.39 (1), p.69-90 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43 |
container_end_page | 90 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Education and urban society |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Hoyle, John R. Collier, Virginia |
description | The focus is on strategies used by 10 urban districts to reduce school dropouts. Thirty-eight strategies for dropout prevention were identified. Although the majority identified dropout prevention strategies, only two districts referred to “recovery programs.” If district spokespersons mentioned their CEOs using a systems approach in reducing dropouts, the program plans were more specific and recovery programs more active. A surprise was the silence about instructional initiatives for early grade intervention and dropout prevention. The most common prevention strategy was punitive measures involving the criminal justice system, that is, police departments, district attorneys. Thus, it is not surprising that the dropout rate in several of these cities remains unabated during the past 5 years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0013124506291983 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57103961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ745033</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0013124506291983</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1172043671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctq20AUhofSQFyn-y66EIVkp-bMTTOzNI57CQFDnKzFeHTkKsgjZ2YUyC6v0dfrk1TCJoFAyOos_u_85_IT8oXCd0qVOgegnDIhoWCGGs0_kAmVkuVccvmRTEY5H_Vj8inGOwAQUokJWd6GtfXZfLHMVv0OQ-MT-gp9iv-e_mazNmHwNjUPmK1SsAk3Dcas8dk1Vr1r_CZbuT9d12YXodt1fYon5Ki2bcTPhzoltz8WN_Nf-dXy5-_57Cp3gtGUK1ELYJauqS4qhga1kAwdMGaAgYYapGESTG2VFVJXnDot16ouCitAVYJPydnedxe6-x5jKrdNdNi21mPXx1IqCtwU9F2QF8MfpNYD-O0VeNf1w_FtLBmwwgwfYwMEe8iFLsaAdbkLzdaGx5JCOeZQvs5haDk9-NrobFsH610TX_o0o0KZ8aKve24IwT3Li8thO-CjTb6Xo93gy2pvjv0P4qCb1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202690042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban CEO Superintendents’ Alternative Strategies in Reducing School Dropouts</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hoyle, John R. ; Collier, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoyle, John R. ; Collier, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>The focus is on strategies used by 10 urban districts to reduce school dropouts. Thirty-eight strategies for dropout prevention were identified. Although the majority identified dropout prevention strategies, only two districts referred to “recovery programs.” If district spokespersons mentioned their CEOs using a systems approach in reducing dropouts, the program plans were more specific and recovery programs more active. A surprise was the silence about instructional initiatives for early grade intervention and dropout prevention. The most common prevention strategy was punitive measures involving the criminal justice system, that is, police departments, district attorneys. Thus, it is not surprising that the dropout rate in several of these cities remains unabated during the past 5 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1245</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0013124506291983</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDUSBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Chief executive officers ; Chief executives ; Dropout Prevention ; Dropout Programs ; Dropout Rate ; Dropouts ; Dropping out ; Education ; Educational organization ; Educational sciences ; Enrollment Management ; General points ; Intervention ; Juvenile justice ; Leadership ; Nontraditional Education ; North America ; Partnerships in Education ; Prevention ; Preventive programmes ; Punishment ; Research Methodology ; School Districts ; School dropout programs ; School Holding Power ; School leavers ; Schools ; Social support ; Sociology of education ; Strategic Planning ; Superintendents ; Third-party intervention ; U.S.A ; United States ; Urban areas ; Urban Schools ; Urban studies</subject><ispartof>Education and urban society, 2006-11, Vol.39 (1), p.69-90</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,31034,31035,33258,33259,33809</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ745033$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18214794$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoyle, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>Urban CEO Superintendents’ Alternative Strategies in Reducing School Dropouts</title><title>Education and urban society</title><description>The focus is on strategies used by 10 urban districts to reduce school dropouts. Thirty-eight strategies for dropout prevention were identified. Although the majority identified dropout prevention strategies, only two districts referred to “recovery programs.” If district spokespersons mentioned their CEOs using a systems approach in reducing dropouts, the program plans were more specific and recovery programs more active. A surprise was the silence about instructional initiatives for early grade intervention and dropout prevention. The most common prevention strategy was punitive measures involving the criminal justice system, that is, police departments, district attorneys. Thus, it is not surprising that the dropout rate in several of these cities remains unabated during the past 5 years.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Chief executive officers</subject><subject>Chief executives</subject><subject>Dropout Prevention</subject><subject>Dropout Programs</subject><subject>Dropout Rate</subject><subject>Dropouts</subject><subject>Dropping out</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational organization</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Enrollment Management</subject><subject>General points</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Nontraditional Education</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive programmes</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School dropout programs</subject><subject>School Holding Power</subject><subject>School leavers</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Sociology of education</subject><subject>Strategic Planning</subject><subject>Superintendents</subject><subject>Third-party intervention</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Schools</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><issn>0013-1245</issn><issn>1552-3535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctq20AUhofSQFyn-y66EIVkp-bMTTOzNI57CQFDnKzFeHTkKsgjZ2YUyC6v0dfrk1TCJoFAyOos_u_85_IT8oXCd0qVOgegnDIhoWCGGs0_kAmVkuVccvmRTEY5H_Vj8inGOwAQUokJWd6GtfXZfLHMVv0OQ-MT-gp9iv-e_mazNmHwNjUPmK1SsAk3Dcas8dk1Vr1r_CZbuT9d12YXodt1fYon5Ki2bcTPhzoltz8WN_Nf-dXy5-_57Cp3gtGUK1ELYJauqS4qhga1kAwdMGaAgYYapGESTG2VFVJXnDot16ouCitAVYJPydnedxe6-x5jKrdNdNi21mPXx1IqCtwU9F2QF8MfpNYD-O0VeNf1w_FtLBmwwgwfYwMEe8iFLsaAdbkLzdaGx5JCOeZQvs5haDk9-NrobFsH610TX_o0o0KZ8aKve24IwT3Li8thO-CjTb6Xo93gy2pvjv0P4qCb1w</recordid><startdate>20061101</startdate><enddate>20061101</enddate><creator>Hoyle, John R.</creator><creator>Collier, Virginia</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Corwin Press</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061101</creationdate><title>Urban CEO Superintendents’ Alternative Strategies in Reducing School Dropouts</title><author>Hoyle, John R. ; Collier, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Chief executive officers</topic><topic>Chief executives</topic><topic>Dropout Prevention</topic><topic>Dropout Programs</topic><topic>Dropout Rate</topic><topic>Dropouts</topic><topic>Dropping out</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational organization</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Enrollment Management</topic><topic>General points</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Nontraditional Education</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive programmes</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School dropout programs</topic><topic>School Holding Power</topic><topic>School leavers</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Sociology of education</topic><topic>Strategic Planning</topic><topic>Superintendents</topic><topic>Third-party intervention</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Schools</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoyle, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Education and urban society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoyle, John R.</au><au>Collier, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ745033</ericid><atitle>Urban CEO Superintendents’ Alternative Strategies in Reducing School Dropouts</atitle><jtitle>Education and urban society</jtitle><date>2006-11-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>69-90</pages><issn>0013-1245</issn><eissn>1552-3535</eissn><coden>EDUSBI</coden><notes>ObjectType-Article-2</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-1</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><abstract>The focus is on strategies used by 10 urban districts to reduce school dropouts. Thirty-eight strategies for dropout prevention were identified. Although the majority identified dropout prevention strategies, only two districts referred to “recovery programs.” If district spokespersons mentioned their CEOs using a systems approach in reducing dropouts, the program plans were more specific and recovery programs more active. A surprise was the silence about instructional initiatives for early grade intervention and dropout prevention. The most common prevention strategy was punitive measures involving the criminal justice system, that is, police departments, district attorneys. Thus, it is not surprising that the dropout rate in several of these cities remains unabated during the past 5 years.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0013124506291983</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-1245 |
ispartof | Education and urban society, 2006-11, Vol.39 (1), p.69-90 |
issn | 0013-1245 1552-3535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57103961 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ERIC; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Alternatives Chief executive officers Chief executives Dropout Prevention Dropout Programs Dropout Rate Dropouts Dropping out Education Educational organization Educational sciences Enrollment Management General points Intervention Juvenile justice Leadership Nontraditional Education North America Partnerships in Education Prevention Preventive programmes Punishment Research Methodology School Districts School dropout programs School Holding Power School leavers Schools Social support Sociology of education Strategic Planning Superintendents Third-party intervention U.S.A United States Urban areas Urban Schools Urban studies |
title | Urban CEO Superintendents’ Alternative Strategies in Reducing School Dropouts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T21%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20CEO%20Superintendents%E2%80%99%20Alternative%20Strategies%20in%20Reducing%20School%20Dropouts&rft.jtitle=Education%20and%20urban%20society&rft.au=Hoyle,%20John%20R.&rft.date=2006-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=69-90&rft.issn=0013-1245&rft.eissn=1552-3535&rft.coden=EDUSBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0013124506291983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1172043671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-74f402a1b186d2e9e8452ec022902080f0592509fa7a458d31c85b7f66a407d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202690042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ745033&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0013124506291983&rfr_iscdi=true |