Loading…

A community-based safer-sex intervention for women: Results of a pilot study in south-eastern France

This study tested the feasibility and short-term acceptability of a public health intervention for women aimed at reducing HIV/STD risk through counselling on a variety of protection methods, including the female condom, spermicides and diaphragms. Women from diverse community groups in Marseille, F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Culture, health & sexuality health & sexuality, 2002-01, Vol.4 (1), p.21-41
Main Authors: Gollub, Erica L., Brown, Edward L., Savouillan, Michele, Waterlot, Juliette, Coruble, Gerard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study tested the feasibility and short-term acceptability of a public health intervention for women aimed at reducing HIV/STD risk through counselling on a variety of protection methods, including the female condom, spermicides and diaphragms. Women from diverse community groups in Marseille, France participated in a five-session group intervention seeking to educate women about their bodies, teach protection skills, develop solidarity, and prompt community diffusion of information and new norms. Intervention sessions were held weekly, and included visual and hands-on demonstration materials and free protection supplies. Knowledge scores on protection methods improved over the course of the study, and 56% of respondents reported having tried the female condom at least once. The intervention was very highly rated, with the best-liked aspect (50%) being the group process. Women of African or French territories' origin rated the female condom more positively than women born in continental France or Europe. Evidence suggests that the approach used is feasible and well-liked by women of diverse cultural backgrounds in south-eastern France. Longer follow-up is required to assess behavioural change.
ISSN:1369-1058
1464-5351
DOI:10.1080/136910502753389369