From Brown to busing

Brown v. Board of Education had little immediate effect on the dual system of education in the South; by the early 1970s, however, Southern schools were the most racially integrated in the country. This paper uses newly assembled and uniquely comprehensive data to document how different types of Sou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of urban economics 2008-09, Vol.64 (2), p.296-325
Main Authors: Cascio, Elizabeth, Gordon, Nora, Lewis, Ethan, Reber, Sarah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bildungswesen
Desegregation
Districts
Education systems
Historical analysis
Integration
Longitudinal studies
Political conditions
Politische Reform
Public schools
Rassenpolitik
Rechtsprechung
School busing
School desegregation
School districts
Schule
Social integration
Studies
Supervision
U.S.A
Vereinigte Staaten-Südstaaten
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Brown v. Board of Education had little immediate effect on the dual system of education in the South; by the early 1970s, however, Southern schools were the most racially integrated in the country. This paper uses newly assembled and uniquely comprehensive data to document how different types of Southern school districts made this transition. Controlling for other factors, we find larger districts were more likely to be under court supervision both early and ever; over time the enrollment threshold for court supervision fell. Poorer districts—which stood to lose larger federal grants if they failed to desegregate—were particularly likely to desegregate between 1964 and 1968. Black enrollment share did not impede “token” desegregation, but was an important predictor of both resistance to intensive desegregation and being supervised by a court in later years. By the end of our sample, in 1976, districts in Alabama and Louisiana were still significantly less integrated than in other states. Within states, however, despite having begun the 1960s with higher levels of segregation and retained them for longer than other districts, districts with stronger historical preferences for segregation had desegregated nearly as much as other districts by 1976; this may be related to their higher rate of court supervision in later years.
ISSN:0094-1190
1095-9068
DOI:10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.001