Loading…

Aerodynamic Scaling for Estimating the Mean Height of Dense Canopies

We used an aerodynamic method to objectively determine a representative canopy height, using standard meteorological measurements. The canopy height may change if the tree height is used to represent the actual canopy, but little work to date has focused on creating a standard for determining the re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Boundary-layer meteorology 2008-09, Vol.128 (3), p.423-443
Main Authors: Nakai, Taro, Sumida, Akihiro, Matsumoto, Kazuho, Daikoku, Ken'ichi, Iida, Shin'ichi, Park, Hotaek, Miyahara, Mie, Kodama, Yuji, Kononov, Alexander V, Maximov, Trofim C, Yabuki, Hironori, Hara, Toshihiko, Ohta, Takeshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We used an aerodynamic method to objectively determine a representative canopy height, using standard meteorological measurements. The canopy height may change if the tree height is used to represent the actual canopy, but little work to date has focused on creating a standard for determining the representative canopy height. Here we propose the 'aerodynamic canopy height' h a as the most effective means of resolving the representative canopy height for all forests. We determined h a by simple linear regression between zero-plane displacement d and roughness length z ₀, without the need for stand inventory data. The applicability of h a was confirmed in five different forests, including a forest with a complex canopy structure. Comparison with stand inventory data showed that h a was almost equivalent to the representative height of trees composing the crown surface if the forest had a simple structure, or to the representative height of taller trees composing the upper canopy in forests with a complex canopy structure. The linear relationship between d and z ₀ was explained by assuming that the logarithmic wind profile above the canopy and the exponential wind profile within the canopy were continuous and smooth at canopy height. This was supported by observations, which showed that h a was essentially the same as the height defined by the inflection point of the vertical profile of wind speed. The applicability of h a was also verified using data from several previous studies.
ISSN:0006-8314
1573-1472
DOI:10.1007/s10546-008-9299-5