Impact of Electric Field Magnitude in the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Changes in Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Randomized Crossover Study

ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the electric field magnitude (E‐field) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L‐DLPFC) changes resting‐state brain activity and the L‐DLPFC resting‐state functional connectivity (rsFC), given the variability in tDCS response and lack of underst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroscience research 2024-09, Vol.102 (9), p.e25378
Main Authors: Kim, Eunkyung, Yun, Seo Jung, Oh, Byung‐Mo, Seo, Han Gil
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the electric field magnitude (E‐field) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L‐DLPFC) changes resting‐state brain activity and the L‐DLPFC resting‐state functional connectivity (rsFC), given the variability in tDCS response and lack of understanding of how rsFC changes. Twenty‐one healthy participants received either 2 mA anodal or sham tDCS targeting the L‐DLPFC for 10 min. Brain imaging was conducted before and after stimulation. The fractional amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuation (fALFF), reflecting resting brain activity, and the L‐DLPFC rsFC were analyzed to investigate the main effect of tDCS, main effect of time, and interaction effects. The E‐field was estimated by modeling tDCS‐induced individual electric fields and correlated with fALFF and L‐DLPFC rsFC. Anodal tDCS increased fALFF in the left rostral middle frontal area and decreased fALFF in the midline frontal area (FWE p < 0.050), whereas sham induced no changes. Overall rsFC decreased after sham (positive and negative connectivity, p = 0.001 and 0.020, respectively), with modest and nonsignificant changes after anodal tDCS ( p = 0.063 and 0.069, respectively). No significant differences in local rsFC were observed among the conditions. Correlations were observed between the E‐field and rsFC changes in the L‐DLPFC ( r = 0.385, p = 0.115), left inferior parietal area ( r = 0.495, p = 0.037), and right lateral visual area ( r = 0.683, p = 0.002). Single‐session tDCS induced resting brain activity changes and may help maintain overall rsFC. The E‐field in the L‐DLPFC is associated with rsFC changes in both proximal and distally connected brain regions to the L‐DLPFC.
ISSN:0360-4012
1097-4547
1097-4547
DOI:10.1002/jnr.25378