An Approach to Successful Development of Clinician–Scientists in Neurology: The NINDS R25 Experience

Objective Training clinician–scientists is a primary objective of many academic neurology departments, as these individuals are uniquely positioned to perform insightful clinical or laboratory‐based research informed both by clinical knowledge and their own experiences caring for patients. Despite i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of neurology 2024-08, Vol.96 (4), p.625-632
Main Authors: Josephson, S. Andrew, Tennekoon, Michael S., Carmichael, S. Thomas, Cash, Sydney S., Detre, John A., Hillis, Argye E., Pennell, Page B., Pomeroy, Scott L., Richerson, George B., Sansing, Lauren H., Korn, Stephen J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Training clinician–scientists is a primary objective of many academic neurology departments, as these individuals are uniquely positioned to perform insightful clinical or laboratory‐based research informed both by clinical knowledge and their own experiences caring for patients. Despite its importance, training clinician–scientists has perhaps never been so challenging. The National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R25 program was designed in an attempt to support these individuals, decrease the time needed to obtain National Institutes of Health K awards, and to help educate a cohort of trainees preparing for a career in academic neurology. We endeavored to describe the structure and features of the program while examining its outcomes. Methods R25 outcome data from 2009 to 2024 were reviewed. Statistical comparisons were made using 2‐sided Mann–Whitney U testing. Results A total of 67% of adult neurologists who received an R25 had a successful application for a National Institutes of Health K award compared with 45% of adult neurologists who had not received R25 support ( p < 0.0001). Among child neurologists, 73% who applied went on to receive K funding after R25 support, compared with 45% who had not been part of the R25 program ( p < 0.001). The average time between completion of residency and obtaining a K award for R25 participants was decreased by 26 months among those with an MD/PhD degree, and 32 months for those with an MD degree compared with non‐R25 individuals. Interpretation The R25 program has been successful in achieving its training goals, but stands as only one component of support for aspiring clinician–scientists. Investments and commitments made by academic neurology departments are key to supporting this success. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:625–632
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/ana.27050