Loading…
The effect of exercise and educational programs for breast cancer patients on the development of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: secondary endpoint from a randomized controlled trial in the Setouchi Breast Project-10
Background Although the association between higher physical activity and preventive effect on breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) has been reported, it is unclear what intervention is optimal. We aimed to investigate the effect of exercise and educational programs on BCRL development. Methods T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2024-09, Vol.31 (5), p.969-978 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Although the association between higher physical activity and preventive effect on breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) has been reported, it is unclear what intervention is optimal. We aimed to investigate the effect of exercise and educational programs on BCRL development.
Methods
This study was a secondary endpoint analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial. We enrolled patients with stage 0–III breast cancer from March 2016 to March 2020 and randomly assigned them to the control (
n
= 111), education (
n
= 115), or exercise (
n
= 104) group. As secondary endpoint, we assessed the incidence of and preventive effect on BCRL at 12 months post-intervention.
Results
There were no significant differences in the incidence of BCRL at 12 months post-intervention between the exercise and control groups (9.8% and 10.8%,
P
= 0.83) and the education and control groups (11.6% and 10.8%,
P
= 1.00). There were no significant differences in time to BCRL onset from the day of surgery between the exercise and control groups (event rate at 12 months: 20.7% and 17.2%, log-rank,
P
= 0.54) and the education and control groups (18.8% and 17.2%, log-rank,
P
= 0.57). The multivariable analyses indicated that axillary dissection and obesity significantly increased the risk of BCRL [hazard ratio (HR): 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52–3.67 and HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.07–2.63, respectively].
Conclusions
The intervention did not decrease the risk of BCRL, and axillary dissection and obesity were the risk factors of BCRL.
Trial registration number
UMIN000020595 at UMIN Clinical Trial Registry. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1340-6868 1880-4233 1880-4233 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12282-024-01610-5 |