Loading…
Negative health outcomes in long sleepers: The societal sleep restriction hypothesis
Society imposes work and school schedules, as well as social expectations, that militate against consistently obtaining more than 7–9 h of sleep every 24 h. For most but not all adults this sleep duration is adequate. But among those who consistently obtain more than 9 h of sleep per day (“long slee...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sleep medicine reviews 2024-10, Vol.77, p.101968, Article 101968 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Society imposes work and school schedules, as well as social expectations, that militate against consistently obtaining more than 7–9 h of sleep every 24 h. For most but not all adults this sleep duration is adequate. But among those who consistently obtain more than 9 h of sleep per day (“long sleepers”), there likely exists a subpopulation of individuals who are nevertheless failing to obtain enough sleep to satisfy their physiological sleep needs – a consequence of “restricting” their daily sleep durations to whatever extent they can tolerate so as to conform as closely as possible to society's norms and expectations. It is hypothesized that the ‘long sleep arm’ of the seemingly paradoxical U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and negative health outcomes can be explained, at least in part, by the existence of a subpopulation of such ‘sleep-restricted long sleepers.’ |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1087-0792 1532-2955 1532-2955 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101968 |