Immobilization during infant fluoroscopy: Pros and cons

This article explores the practice of immobilization during fluoroscopy procedures for infants, discussing its advantages and disadvantages. The authors examine contrasting policies and thoughts on immobilization across different medical institutions. While some advocate for its routine use to minim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical imaging 2024-09, Vol.113, p.110223, Article 110223
Main Authors: Pfeifer, Cory M., Ghannam, Sammar, Weakley, Brynn, Gokli, Ami
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Immobilization devices
Infant fluoroscopy
Patient consent
Pediatric radiology
Radiation exposure
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article explores the practice of immobilization during fluoroscopy procedures for infants, discussing its advantages and disadvantages. The authors examine contrasting policies and thoughts on immobilization across different medical institutions. While some advocate for its routine use to minimize patient motion, enhance imaging quality, and decrease radiation exposure, others question its necessity and raise concerns about patient consent and parental distress. Ethical dilemmas are also discussed regarding patient autonomy and psychological impact on families. The authors advocate for a balanced approach, recognizing the utility of immobilization in certain clinical scenarios while still emphasizing patient-centered care. Ultimately, the article underscores the importance of institutional policies that prioritize both patient safety and ethical principles in pediatric radiology practices. •Immobilization devices aim to reduce radiation exposure and improve image quality by minimizing patient motion.•Some healthcare professionals consider immobilization unnecessary while others adhere firmly to it.•Institution specific policies heavily influence the use of immobilization.•This article suggests situtations in which either approach may be appropriate.
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110223