Electrocatalytic reduction of nitrate in water

Nitrate (NO 3 −) contamination of groundwater is a common problem throughout intensive agricultural areas (nonpoint source pollution). Current processes (e.g., ion exchange, membrane separation) for NO 3 − removal have various disadvantages. The objective of this study was to evaluate an electrocata...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water research (Oxford) 2003-05, Vol.37 (10), p.2512-2519
Main Authors: Peel, J.W, Reddy, K.J, Sullivan, B.P, Bowen, J.M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agriculture
Agriculture industry
Applied sciences
Carbon - chemistry
Catalysis
Chemical denitrification
Drinking water
Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination
Electrolysis
Exact sciences and technology
Nitrates - chemistry
Oxidation-Reduction
Pollution
Rural communities
Soil
Water Pollution - prevention & control
Water Purification
Water quality
Water treatment and pollution
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nitrate (NO 3 −) contamination of groundwater is a common problem throughout intensive agricultural areas (nonpoint source pollution). Current processes (e.g., ion exchange, membrane separation) for NO 3 − removal have various disadvantages. The objective of this study was to evaluate an electrocatalytic reduction process to selectively remove NO 3 − from groundwater associated with small agricultural communities. A commercially available ELAT (E-Tek Inc., Natick, MA) carbon cloth with a 30% surface coated Rh (rhodium) (1 μg cm −1) was tested at an applied potential of –1.5 V versus standard calomel electrode (SCE) with a Pt auxiliary electrode. Electrocatalytic reduction process (electrolysis) of NO 3 − was tested with cyclic voltammetry (CV) in samples containing NO 3 − and 0.1 M NaClO 4 −. Nitrate and NO 2 − concentrations in test solutions and groundwater samples were analyzed by ion chromatography (IC). The presence of Rh on the carbon cloth surface resulted in current increase of 36% over uncoated carbon cloths. The electrocatalysis experiments using Rh coated carbon cloth resulted in reduction of NO 3 − and NO 2 − on a timescale of minutes. Nitrite is produced as a product, but is rapidly consumed upon further electrolysis. Field groundwater samples subjected to electrocatalysis experiments, without the addition of NaClO 4 − electrolyte, also exhibited removal of NO 3 − on a timescale of minutes. Overall, results suggest that at an applied potential of –1.5 V with respect to SCE, Rh coated carbon cloth can reduce NO 3 − concentrations in field groundwater samples from 73 to 39 mg/L (16.58 to 8.82 mg/L as N) on a timescale range of 40–60 min. The electrocatalytic reduction process described in this study may prove useful for removing NO 3 − and NO 2 − from groundwater associated with nonpoint source pollution.
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00008-3