Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A favorable approach for frail patients with pancreatic cancer

Within the past decade, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has been increasingly adopted in high-volume cancer centers. Amid broader trends of a growing older population, the numbers of frail patients with cancer are expected to increase. In this study, we compared the postoperative outcomes...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Surgery 2024-04, Vol.175 (4), p.1168-1175
Main Authors:	Farah, Emile, Al Abbas, Amr, Abreu, Andres A., Cheng, Mingyuan, Yopp, Adam, Wang, Sam, Mansour, John, Porembka, Matthew, Zeh, Herbert J., Polanco, Patricio M.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Aged Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery Frail Elderly Frailty - complications Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Pancreatic Neoplasms Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Within the past decade, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has been increasingly adopted in high-volume cancer centers. Amid broader trends of a growing older population, the numbers of frail patients with cancer are expected to increase. In this study, we compared the postoperative outcomes of open pancreaticoduodenectomy and minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in frail patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Using the pancreatectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2014–2021), we identified pancreaticoduodenectomy cases for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients with a modified frailty index ≥2 were considered frail. We performed 2:1 (open pancreaticoduodenectomy to minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy) optimal pair propensity score matching for both patient- and disease-specific characteristics. We evaluated baseline covariate balance for homogeneity and assessed 30-day postoperative outcomes: complications, discharge destination, major morbidity, and mortality. We identified 3,143 frail patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Of those, 275 (9%) underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of any complications compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (43% vs 54%; P < .001), major morbidity (29% vs 35%; P = .042), and nonhome discharge (12% vs 17%; P = .022). When comparing the 2 minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy approaches, robotic surgery was associated with fewer complications compared with laparoscopy (39% vs 51%; P = .040) and a lower mortality rate (1% vs 4%; P = .041) In frail patients with pancreatic cancer, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy was associated with better postoperative outcomes than open pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study builds on growing literature reporting that, when properly implemented, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with more favorable postoperative outcomes. Given the particularly high risk of complication in frail patients, implementing a preoperative frailty assessment can provide valuable insights to inform patient counseling.
ISSN:	0039-6060 1532-7361