Loading…
The role of brain perfusion SPECT in the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: A systematic review
Background and Purpose Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of presenile dementia. The clinical distinction between FTD, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and other dementias is a clinical challenge. Brain perfusion SPECT may contribute to the diagnosis of FTD, but its value is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neuroimaging 2024-05, Vol.34 (3), p.308-319 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background and Purpose
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of presenile dementia. The clinical distinction between FTD, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and other dementias is a clinical challenge. Brain perfusion SPECT may contribute to the diagnosis of FTD, but its value is unclear.
Methods
We performed a systematic review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the brain SPECT in (1) distinguishing FTD from AD and other dementias and (2) differentiating FTD variants.
Results
Overall, 391 studies were retrieved on the initial search and 35 studies composed the final selection, comprising a total number of 3142 participants of which 1029 had FTD. The sensitivity and the specificity for the differential diagnosis of FTD versus AD ranged from 56% to 88% and from 51% to 93%, respectively. SPECT is not superior to the clinical method of diagnosis, but the combination of SPECT with clinical data seems to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion
Brain perfusion SPECT has a limited value in the diagnostic framework of FTD. SPECT can be performed when FDG‐PET is not available. SPECT is recommended only for selected cases when the diagnosis is challenging using conventional methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1051-2284 1552-6569 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jon.13189 |