The psychophysiology of Mastermind: Characterizing response times and blinking in a high‐stakes television game show

Television game shows have proven to be a valuable resource for studying human behavior under conditions of high stress and high stakes. However, previous work has focused mostly on choices—ignoring much of the rich visual information that is available on screen. Here, we take a first step to extrac...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Psychophysiology 2024-03, Vol.61 (3), p.e14485-n/a
Main Authors:	Wyly, Skyler, Jinon, Neryanne, Francis, Timothy, Evans, Hailey, Kao, Tsai Lieh, Lambert, Shelby, Montgomery, Shayne, Newlove, Marvelene, Mariscal, Haley, Nguyen, Henry, Cole, Harrison, Aispuro, Israel, Robledo, Daniela, Tenaglia, Olivia, Weinberger, Nina, Nguyen, Bill, Waits, Hailey, Jorian, Daisy, Koch‐Kreher, Lucas, Myrdal, Hunter, Antoniou, Victoria, Warrier, Meghana, Wunsch, Leah, Arce, Iram, Kirchner, Kayla, Campos, Elena, Nguyen, An, Rodriguez, Kaitlynn, Cao, Lanqin, Halmekangas, Avery, Wilson, Robert C.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Accuracy Blinking cognition Cognitive ability game show Humans Physiological psychology post‐error slowing Psychophysiology Reaction Time real‐world behavior Television
Online Access:	Request full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Television game shows have proven to be a valuable resource for studying human behavior under conditions of high stress and high stakes. However, previous work has focused mostly on choices—ignoring much of the rich visual information that is available on screen. Here, we take a first step to extracting more of this information by investigating the response times and blinking of contestants in the BBC show Mastermind. In Mastermind, contestants answer rapid‐fire quiz questions while a camera slowly zooms in on their faces. By labeling contestants' behavior and blinks from 25 episodes, we asked how accuracy, response times, and blinking varied over the course of the game. For accuracy and response times, we tested whether contestants responded more accurately and more slowly after an error—exhibiting the “post‐error increase in accuracy” and “post‐error slowing” which has been repeatedly observed in the lab. For blinking, we tested whether blink rates varied according to the cognitive demands of the game—decreasing during periods of cognitive load, such as when pondering a response, and increasing at event boundaries in the task, such as the start of a question. In contrast to the lab, evidence for post‐error changes in accuracy and response time was weak, with only marginal effects observed. In line with the lab, blinking varied over the course of the game much as we predicted. Overall, our findings demonstrate the potential of extracting dynamic signals from game shows to study the psychophysiology of behavior in the real world. Video analysis of television game shows offers a unique opportunity to study psychophysiology under conditions that would be difficult to replicate in the lab. Using this approach, we investigate how accuracy, response times, and blinking vary in the rapid‐fire quiz show Mastermind. We find that all of measures are strongly modulated by game events, but not always in a manner that is consistent with the lab. Our work highlights the potential of game shows for studying psychophysiology in the real world.
ISSN:	0048-5772 1540-5958