Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence

Metamemory, or the ability to understand the capacities of one’s own memory, is important for learning. To investigate questions surrounding metamemory, researchers commonly have participants make judgments of learning (JOLs) at encoding, in which participants rate their likelihood of recalling the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychological research 2024-04, Vol.88 (3), p.1023-1044
Main Authors: Maxwell, Nicholas P., Cates, Emily E., Huff, Mark J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Calibration
Cues
Humans
Illusions
Judgment
Learning
Mental Recall
Metacognition
Psychology
Psychology Research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Metamemory, or the ability to understand the capacities of one’s own memory, is important for learning. To investigate questions surrounding metamemory, researchers commonly have participants make judgments of learning (JOLs) at encoding, in which participants rate their likelihood of recalling the target in a cue–target word pair when shown only the cue at test. However, the associative direction of cue–target pairs can affect the calibration of JOLs. Unlike forward associates (e.g., credit–card), in which JOLs often accurately predict recall, an illusion of competence has been reported for backward associates (e.g., card–credit), symmetrical associates (e.g., salt–pepper), and unrelated cue–target pairs (e.g., artery–bronze) such that JOLs overestimate later recall. The present study evaluates whether the illusion of competence can be reduced when participants apply deep item-specific or relational encoding tasks relative to silent reading. Across two experiments, we show that both item-specific and relational encoding strategies reduce the illusion of competence for backward associates and unrelated pairs while improving the calibration between JOLs and recall. Our findings suggest that these encoding strategies are effective at reducing the illusion of competence, with increased calibration primarily reflecting improved recall. Thus, item-specific and relational encoding strategies primarily affect retrieval processes rather than metacognitive processes that participants engage in at encoding.
ISSN:0340-0727
1430-2772
DOI:10.1007/s00426-023-01891-z