Versatility of the double fascicular transfer in reconstruction of elbow flexion paralysis: Intermediate term follow-up and patient-related outcome measures

The use of fascicle transfers in the reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injury is well established, but limited evidence is available regarding their use in atraumatic elbow flexion paralysis. This retrospective case review aimed to verify whether median and ulnar fascicle transfers are sim...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2023-12, Vol.87, p.494-501
Main Authors:	Turner, Lewis, Duraku, Liron S, Ramadan, Sami, van der Oest, Mark, Miller, Caroline, George, Samuel, Chaudhry, Tahseen, Power, Dominic M
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Brachial Plexus Neuropathies - surgery Elbow Elbow Joint - innervation Elbow Joint - surgery Follow-Up Studies Humans Median Nerve - surgery Nerve Transfer Outcome Assessment, Health Care Paralysis - surgery Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Ulnar Nerve - surgery
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	The use of fascicle transfers in the reconstruction of traumatic brachial plexus injury is well established, but limited evidence is available regarding their use in atraumatic elbow flexion paralysis. This retrospective case review aimed to verify whether median and ulnar fascicle transfers are similarly effective in atraumatic versus traumatic elbow flexion paralysis when measured using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, Brachial plexus Assessment Tool (BrAT) and Stanmore Percentage of Normal Elbow Assessment (SPONEA) scores at long-term follow-up. All median and ulnar fascicle transfer cases performed at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham between August 2007 and November 2018 were reviewed to compare the outcomes of transfers performed for traumatic and atraumatic indications. Data on patient demographics, mechanism and nature of injury, date of injury or symptom onset, date of operation, and other nerve transfers performed were collected. Outcome measures collected included the British MRC scale and two patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), BrAT and SPONEA. In total, 34 patients with 45 median and ulnar fascicle transfers were identified. This included 27 traumatic and seven atraumatic brachial plexus insults. Thirty patients had sufficient follow-up to be included in MRC analysis and 17 patients had sufficient follow-up to be included in PROM analysis. No significant differences were found between traumatic and atraumatic subgroups for median MRC, BrAT, or SPONEA scores. This study suggests that nerve transfers might be considered effective reconstructive options in atraumatic pathology and provides validation for further research on the subject.
ISSN:	1748-6815 1878-0539