Predictions about prosody facilitate lexical access: Evidence from P50/N100 and MMN components

Research into the neural foundation of perception asserts a model where top-down predictions modulate the bottom-up processing of sensory input. Despite becoming increasingly influential in cognitive neuroscience, the precise account of this predictive coding framework remains debated. In this study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of psychophysiology 2023-12, Vol.194, p.112262-112262, Article 112262
Main Authors: Zora, Hatice, Wester, Janniek, Csépe, Valéria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Lexical access
MMN
P50/N100
Predictive coding
Prosody
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research into the neural foundation of perception asserts a model where top-down predictions modulate the bottom-up processing of sensory input. Despite becoming increasingly influential in cognitive neuroscience, the precise account of this predictive coding framework remains debated. In this study, we aim to contribute to this debate by investigating how predictions about prosody facilitate speech perception, and to shed light especially on lexical access influenced by simultaneous predictions in different domains, inter alia, prosodic and semantic. Using a passive auditory oddball paradigm, we examined neural responses to prosodic changes, leading to a semantic change as in Dutch nouns canon [ˈkaːnɔn] ‘canon’ vs kanon [kaːˈnɔn] ‘cannon’, and used acoustically identical pseudowords as controls. Results from twenty-eight native speakers of Dutch (age range 18–32 years) indicated an enhanced P50/N100 complex to prosodic change in pseudowords as well as an MMN response to both words and pseudowords. The enhanced P50/N100 response to pseudowords is claimed to indicate that all relevant auditory information is still processed by the brain, whereas the reduced response to words might reflect the suppression of information that has already been encoded. The MMN response to pseudowords and words, on the other hand, is best justified by the unification of previously established prosodic representations with sensory and semantic input respectively. This pattern of results is in line with the predictive coding framework acting on multiple levels and is of crucial importance to indicate that predictions about linguistic prosodic information are utilized by the brain as early as 50 ms. •The brain does not simply respond to prosodic changes in the acoustic environment but interprets them based on experiences.•Neural representation of word stress contributes to generating predictions during lexical access.•The brain evaluates linguistic prosodic information as early as 50 ms.
ISSN:0167-8760
1872-7697
DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2023.112262