Barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainment of guideline-recommended depression screening for patients with breast cancer in medical oncology: a qualitative study

Objectives Implementation of guideline-recommended depression screening in oncology presents numerous challenges. Implementation strategies that are responsive to local context may be critical elements of adoption and sustainment. We evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementation of a depress...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supportive care in cancer 2023-08, Vol.31 (8), p.461, Article 461
Main Authors: Hahn, Erin E., Munoz-Plaza, Corrine E., Lyons, Lindsay Joe, Lee, Janet S., Pounds, Dana, La Cava, Shannon, Brasfield, Farah M., Durna, Lara N., Kwan, Karen W., Beard, David B., Ferreira, Alexander, Gould, Michael K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - complications
Breast Neoplasms - psychology
Cancer
Cancer patients
Clinical practice guidelines
Depression - diagnosis
Depression - etiology
Depression, Mental
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental depression
Middle Aged
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Oncology, Experimental
Pain Medicine
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Qualitative Research
Rehabilitation Medicine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives Implementation of guideline-recommended depression screening in oncology presents numerous challenges. Implementation strategies that are responsive to local context may be critical elements of adoption and sustainment. We evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementation of a depression screening program for breast cancer patients in a community medical oncology setting as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Methods Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we employed qualitative methods to evaluate clinician, administrator, and patient perceptions of the program using semi-structured interviews. We used a team-coding approach for the data; thematic development focused on barriers and facilitators to implementation using a grounded theory approach. The codebook was refined through open discussions of subjectivity and unintentional bias, coding, and memo applications (including emergent coding), and the hierarchical structure and relationships of themes. Results We conducted 20 interviews with 11 clinicians/administrators and 9 patients. Five major themes emerged: (1) gradual acceptance and support of the intervention and workflow; (2) compatibility with system and personal norms and goals; (3) reinforcement of the value of and need for adaptability; (4) self-efficacy within the nursing team; and (5) importance of identifying accountable front-line staff beyond leadership “champions.” Conclusions Findings suggest a high degree of acceptability and feasibility due to the selection of appropriate implementation strategies, alignment of norms and goals, and a high degree of workflow adaptability. These findings will be uniquely helpful in generating actionable, real-world knowledge to inform the design, implementation, and sustainment of guideline-recommended depression screening programs in oncology. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02941614
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07922-0