Prediction, prevention, and treatment of post reperfusion syndrome in adult orthotopic liver transplant patients

Importance This review explores proposed predictors, preventative measures, and treatment options for post‐reperfusion syndrome (PRS) in liver transplantation and provides updated data for clinicians. Objectives The review aims to understand the status and progress made regarding PRS during orthotop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical transplantation 2023-06, Vol.37 (6), p.e15014-n/a
Main Authors: DeMaria, Samuel, Nolasco, Lyle, Igwe, Divya, Jules, Robert St, Bekki, Yuki, Smith, Natalie K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Humans
liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Reperfusion - adverse effects
Reperfusion Injury - etiology
Reperfusion Injury - prevention & control
reperfusion liver cirrhosis
Retrospective Studies
Syndrome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Importance This review explores proposed predictors, preventative measures, and treatment options for post‐reperfusion syndrome (PRS) in liver transplantation and provides updated data for clinicians. Objectives The review aims to understand the status and progress made regarding PRS during orthotopic liver transplantation. Moreover, the predictors of PRS will be analyzed to highlight risk factors. Mediators of PRS and the modes of action of the currently available preventative and management agents that target particular PRS factors will be investigated. Data Sources Data is drawn from secondary sources from databases of peer‐reviewed journals. The bibliographies of select sources were also used to obtain additional data studies using the ‘snowball’ method. Study Selection The initial data search provided 1394 studies analyzed using PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR) guidelines. After applying the eligibility criteria, 18 studies were fit for inclusion. Results The study identified that in addition to the severity of underlying medical conditions, other significant PRS predictors included patient age, sex, duration of cold ischemia, and the surgical technique. While the use of epinephrine and norepinephrine is well‐established, further preventative measures commonly involve specifically targeting known mediators of the syndrome, such as antioxidants, vasodilators, free radical scavengers, and anticoagulants. Current management strategies involve supportive therapy. Machine Perfusion may ultimately decrease the risk of PRS. Conclusion PRS still holds unknowns, including the underlying pathophysiology, controllable factors, and ideal management practices. There is a need for further study, particularly prospective trials since liver transplantation is the gold standard for treating end‐stage liver disease and the incidence of PRS remains high.
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.15014