Hospital Admissions in Pediatric Patients With Tracheostomies Based on Rurality and Insurance Status

Objective Determine whether rurality or public insurance status is associated with greater 30‐day readmission after tracheostomy in pediatric patients. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database. Methods Patients within PHIS who underwent tracheost...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2023-07, Vol.169 (1), p.129-135
Main Authors:	Van Horn, Adam J., Good, Raquel, Thatcher, Aaron L., Nation, Javan J., Friesen, Tzyynong L., Kirkham, Erin M.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Child Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Insurance Coverage Patient Readmission pediatric tracheostomy public insurance readmission Retrospective Studies rural social determinants of health Tracheostomy
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Objective Determine whether rurality or public insurance status is associated with greater 30‐day readmission after tracheostomy in pediatric patients. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Database. Methods Patients within PHIS who underwent tracheostomy from 2013 to 2017 were included. Rural status was defined by rural‐urban commuting area codes. Insurance status was based on the primary payer. All‐cause 30‐day readmissions and tracheostomy‐related readmissions were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to test for differences in readmissions between cohorts. Results Among patients, 1092 were rural, and 4329 were publicly insured, with no significant association between rurality and insurance. Compared to nonrural patients, rural patients were more frequently white, less frequently ventilator dependent, and more likely discharged home rather than to a care facility. Publicly insured patients were more frequently non‐white. Twenty‐eight percent of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Odds of 30‐day readmission were lower in rural patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68‐0.95, p = .01) but higher in publicly insured (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09‐1.42, p = .001) controlling for age at tracheostomy, sex, race, and ventilator dependence. The odds of tracheostomy‐related admission did not differ by rurality but were higher in publicly insured children (1.39, 95% CI: 1.03‐1.88, p = .03). Conclusion Readmission within 30 days following tracheostomy was more likely in publicly insured patients and less likely in rural patients. These findings help identify at‐risk patients when considering discharge planning and follow‐up. More work is needed to understand long‐term tracheostomy outcomes in these groups.
ISSN:	0194-5998 1097-6817