Complications after early versus late mobilization after an incidental durotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background An incidental durotomy (IDT) is a frequent complication of spinal surgery. The conventional management involving a period of flat bed rest is highly debatable. Indeed, there are scanty data and no consensus regarding the need or ideal duration of post-operative bed rest following IDT. Obj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European spine journal 2023-03, Vol.32 (3), p.778-786
Main Authors: Najjar, Elie, Hassanin, Mohamed A., Komaitis, Spyridon, Karouni, Faris, Quraishi, Nasir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Back surgery
Humans
Immobilization
Literature reviews
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Middle Aged
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgical Procedures
Patients
Reoperation
Review Article
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Systematic review
Thoracic surgery
Thorax
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background An incidental durotomy (IDT) is a frequent complication of spinal surgery. The conventional management involving a period of flat bed rest is highly debatable. Indeed, there are scanty data and no consensus regarding the need or ideal duration of post-operative bed rest following IDT. Objective To systematically evaluate the literature regarding the outcomes of mobilization within 24 h and after 24 h following IDT in open lumbar or thoracic surgery with respect to the length of hospital stay, minor and major complications. Methods A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane and dating up until September 2022 was undertaken following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using a modified version of Sackett's Criteria of Evidence Support. Results Out of 532 articles, 6 studies met the inclusion criteria (1 Level-I, 4 level-III and 1 Level-IV evidence) and were analyzed. Overall, 398 patients of mean age 59.9 years were mobilized within 24 h. The average length of stay (LOS) for this group was 5.7 days. Thirty-four patients (8.5%) required reoperation while the rate of minor complications was 25.4%. Additionally, 265 patients of mean age 63 years with IDT were mobilized after 24 h. The average LOS was 7.8 days. Twenty patients (7.54%) required reoperation while the rate of minor complications was 55%. Meta-analysis comparing early to late mobilization, showed a significant reduction in the risk of minor complications and shorter overall LOS due to early mobilization, but no significant difference in major complications and reoperation rates. Conclusions Although early mobilization after repaired incidental dural tears in open lumbar and thoracic spinal surgery has a similar major complication/ reoperation rates compared to late mobilization, it significantly decreases the risk of minor complications and length of hospitalization.
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07526-6