Loading…

Safety of increasing protein delivery with an enteral nutrition formula containing very high protein (VHP) and lower carbohydrate concentrations compared to conventional standard (SF) and high protein (HP) formulas

Studies demonstrate that caloric restriction in the first seven days in the ICU is safe. The amount of protein that should be delivered, however, is still unclear with clinical trials suggesting mixed results. Despite some capacity to customize the delivery of protein using supplemental modules, pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2022-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2833-2842
Main Authors: Ochoa Gautier, Juan B., Berger, Andrea, Hussein, Raghad, Huhmann, Maureen B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Studies demonstrate that caloric restriction in the first seven days in the ICU is safe. The amount of protein that should be delivered, however, is still unclear with clinical trials suggesting mixed results. Despite some capacity to customize the delivery of protein using supplemental modules, protein delivered is best determined by the concentration of protein contained in enteral formula (EF) ordered. This fact provides an opportunity to explore the potential clinical effects of protein delivery and lower carbohydrate intake on clinical outcomes compared with conventional enteral formulas. Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes according to the amount of protein delivered in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units at Geisinger Health System. 2000 encounters (1899 patients) in patients on enteral nutrition were divided into three groups receiving EF with either ≤20% protein (standard formula – SF), 21–25% protein (high protein – HP) or > 25% protein (VHP). Protein intake increased up to day 7 (p 
ISSN:0261-5614
1532-1983
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.10.020