Loading…
PGT pregnancies have a similar risk for post-partum complications as naturally conceived pregnancies
Do preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) pregnancies have higher post-partum complications compared with naturally conceived pregnancies? Retrospective cohort study conducted in 2008–2020 at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC), including all patients aged 18–45 years old who conceived following P...
Saved in:
Published in: | Reproductive biomedicine online 2023-01, Vol.46 (1), p.189-195 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Do preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) pregnancies have higher post-partum complications compared with naturally conceived pregnancies?
Retrospective cohort study conducted in 2008–2020 at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC), including all patients aged 18–45 years old who conceived following PGT with a singleton live birth >24 weeks. Data were collected from computerized hospital databases and patient files. There were two control groups: (i) pregnancies following IVF-ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection); (ii) four neighbourhood controls for each case delivery (two women delivered before and two after) of women with naturally conceived pregnancies.
Overall, 120 PGT, 779 IVF-ICSI and 3507 naturally conceived deliveries were included. Demographic variables were similar apart from slightly higher age in the PGT (P = 0.003) and ICSI (P = 0.002) groups (31.07 ± 4.38 PGT, 31.66 ± 5.03 ICSI, 28.77 ± 5.72 naturally conceived). Composite post-partum placental-related complications (manual lysis of placenta, revision of uterine cavity, haemoglobin drop ≥3 g/dl, post-partum haemorrhage, need for blood transfusion) were more prevalent in both the PGT and IVF-ICSI groups as opposed to naturally conceived (20.0% versus 18.9% versus 10.3%, respectively, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1472-6483 1472-6491 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.009 |