Sexuality Training in Counseling Psychology: A Mixed-Methods Study of Student Perspectives

Counseling psychologists are a cogent fit to lead the movement toward a sex-positive professional psychology (Burnes et al., 2017a). Though centralizing training in human sexuality (HS; Mollen & Abbott, 2021) and sexual and reproductive health (Grzanka & Frantell, 2017) is congruent with cou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of counseling psychology 2023-01, Vol.70 (1), p.52-66
Main Authors: Abbott, Dena M., Vargas, Jacob E., Santiago, Hali J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Competence
Counseling - education
Counseling Psychology
Counselling psychologists
Counselor Trainees
Counselors
Female
Focus Groups
Graduate Students
Human
Humans
Independent study
Learning
Male
Mixed methods research
Positive psychology
Psychologists
Psychology - education
Reproductive health
Resistance (Psychology)
Selfdirected learning
Sexual Behavior
Sexuality
Social justice
Student Attitudes
Student health services
Students
Students - psychology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Counseling psychologists are a cogent fit to lead the movement toward a sex-positive professional psychology (Burnes et al., 2017a). Though centralizing training in human sexuality (HS; Mollen & Abbott, 2021) and sexual and reproductive health (Grzanka & Frantell, 2017) is congruent with counseling psychologists' values, training programs rarely require or integrate comprehensive sexuality training for their students (Mollen et al., 2020). We employed a critical mixed-methods design in the interest of centering the missing voices of doctoral-level graduate students in counseling psychology in the discussion of the importance of human sexuality competence for counseling psychologists. Using focus groups to ascertain students' perspectives on their human sexuality training (HST) in counseling psychology, responses yielded five themes: (a) HST is integral to counseling psychology training, (b) few opportunities to gain human sexuality competence, (c) inconsistent training and self-directed learning, (d) varying levels of human sexuality comfort and competence, and (e) desire for integration of HST. Survey responses suggested students were trained on the vast majority of human sexuality topics at low levels, consistent with prior studies surveying training directors in counseling psychology and at internship training sites (Abbott et al., 2021; Mollen et al., 2020). Taken together, results suggested students see HST as aligned with the social justice emphasis in counseling psychology but found their current training was inconsistent, incidental rather than intentional, and lacked depth. Recommendations, contextualized within counseling psychology values, are offered to increase opportunities for and strengthen HST in counseling psychology training programs. Public Significance Statement The present study suggests that counseling psychology graduate students perceive human sexuality training (HST) as valuable to their professional development and congruent with counseling psychology values. Findings support the integration of consistent, comprehensive, sex-positive HST in doctoral counseling psychology training programs.
ISSN:0022-0167
1939-2168
DOI:10.1037/cou0000641