Loading…
The Systematic Isolation of Key Parameters for Estimating Skeletal Maturity on Lateral Elbow Radiographs
Background: Skeletal maturity estimation is central in the management of scoliosis and lower-limb deformity. Utilizing demographic characteristics and modern computing, we sought to create a reliable, rapid, and accurate method for measuring skeletal maturity on an elbow radiograph. Methods: Utilizi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2022-11, Vol.104 (22), p.1993-1999 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background:
Skeletal maturity estimation is central in the management of scoliosis and lower-limb deformity. Utilizing demographic characteristics and modern computing, we sought to create a reliable, rapid, and accurate method for measuring skeletal maturity on an elbow radiograph.
Methods:
Utilizing the Bolton-Brush Collection, 4 parameters from the modified Sauvegrain method and 7 novel parameters were screened. Ten parameters were evaluated on serial peripubertal elbow radiographs, using Greulich and Pyle (GP) skeletal age from corresponding hand radiographs as a comparison. Stepwise linear regression and generalized estimating equations were used to identify radiographic and demographic parameters for estimating skeletal maturity based on 90% of final height. The elbow system was compared with GP only; olecranon apophysis only; age, sex, and GP; age, sex, and olecranon apophysis; age, sex, and elbow system with anteroposterior and lateral parameters; age, sex, and elbow system with anteroposterior parameters; and age, sex, and elbow system with lateral parameters.
Results:
In this study, 367 radiographs from 77 patients (40 girls and 37 boys) were included. Following stepwise linear regression, 4 radiographic parameters were included in the anteroposterior and lateral elbow system; 3 were included in the anteroposterior elbow system; and 4 were included in the lateral elbow system. The lateral elbow system predicted skeletal maturity with a mean discrepancy of 0.41 year and produced similar mean discrepancies to GP with age and sex (0.42; p = 0.93), and it trended toward better performance than the olecranon apophysis system with age and sex (0.43; p = 0.06). The lateral elbow system had the lowest percent of outlier predictions >1 year discrepant from the skeletal maturity reference (4.6%), although it was only significantly better than the GP-only group (29.4%) and the olecranon apophysis-only group (21.0%) (p < 0.001 for both).
Conclusions:
We systematically developed a lateral elbow system that performed equivalently to GP using 4 simple parameters and trended toward outperforming the olecranon apophysis systems in skeletal maturity estimation. Future clinical validation will be necessary to understand the utility of this system.
Clinical Relevance:
The lateral elbow system may be a more accurate prediction of skeletal maturity compared with the previously described olecranon apophysis system and can be used to guide the management of many pediatr |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
| DOI: | 10.2106/JBJS.22.00312 |