Loading…

R-CHOP Vs DA-EPOCH-R for Double-Expressor Lymphoma: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUNDManaging double-expressor lymphomas (DEL) is controversial given the dearth of data and lack of standardized guidelines on this high-risk subset of lymphomas. No prospective and few retrospective studies limited by either their sample size or short follow-up address the question of initial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia myeloma and leukemia, 2022-10, Vol.22 (10), p.e947-e957
Main Authors: Othman, Tamer, Penaloza, Juan, Zhang, Shiliang, Daniel, Claire E., Gaut, Daria, Oliai, Caspian, Brem, Elizabeth A, Baweja, Abinav, Ly, Jane, Reid, Jack, Pinter-Brown, Lauren, Lee, Matthew, Abdulhaq, Haifaa, Tuscano, Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUNDManaging double-expressor lymphomas (DEL) is controversial given the dearth of data and lack of standardized guidelines on this high-risk subset of lymphomas. No prospective and few retrospective studies limited by either their sample size or short follow-up address the question of initial treatment of choice for DEL. We performed the largest analysis to date exploring R-CHOP vs DA-EPOCH-R in DEL. METHODSAdults with DEL diagnosed from 6/2012-2/2021 at 4 unique sites were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall and complete response rates (ORR and CRR), cumulative incidence of relapse, and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) utilization. RESULTS155 patients were included, 61 treated with R-CHOP and 94 with DA-EPOCH-R. 3-year PFS and OS were similar between R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R, 33.2% vs 57.2%,(P = .063), and 72.2% vs 71.6% (P = .43) after median follow-up times of 2.43 and 2.89 years, respectively. Patients
ISSN:2152-2650
2152-2669
DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2022.06.013