Loading…
Early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and readmissions for permanent pacemaker implantation
Objective To examine the rate of readmission for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation with early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Background There is a current trend toward early discharge after TAVR. However, paucity of data exists on the impact of such p...
Saved in:
Published in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2022-08, Vol.100 (2), p.245-253 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To examine the rate of readmission for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation with early versus late discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Background
There is a current trend toward early discharge after TAVR. However, paucity of data exists on the impact of such practice on readmissions for PPM implantation.
Methods
The Nationwide Readmission Database 2016–2018 was queried for all hospitalizations where patients underwent TAVR. Hospitalizations were stratified into early (Days 0 and 1) versus late (≥Day 2) discharge groups. Observations in which PPM was required in the index admission were excluded. Multivariable regression analyses involving patient‐ and hospital‐related variables were utilized. The primary outcome was 90‐day readmission for PPM implantation.
Results
The final analysis included 68,482 TAVR hospitalizations, 20,261 (29.6%) with early versus 48,221 (70.4%) with late discharge. Early discharge after TAVR increased over the study period (16.2% in 2016 vs. 37.9% in 2018, Ptrend |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.30299 |