Effect of Anterolateral Structure Augmentation on Graft Maturity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical and MRI Follow-up of 2 Years

Background: Anterolateral structure augmentation (ALSA) has been applied to prevent residual rotatory instability and lower clinical failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR); however, the effect of combined ALSA on the maturity of ACL grafts remains unknown. Purpose...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of sports medicine 2022-06, Vol.50 (7), p.1805-1814
Main Authors: Ye, Zipeng, Xu, Junjie, Chen, Jiebo, Cho, Eunshinae, Cai, Jiangyu, Wu, Chenliang, Wu, Xiulin, Li, Ziyun, Xie, Guoming, Zhao, Jinzhong, Dong, Shikui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Knee
Magnetic resonance imaging
Patients
Sports medicine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Anterolateral structure augmentation (ALSA) has been applied to prevent residual rotatory instability and lower clinical failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR); however, the effect of combined ALSA on the maturity of ACL grafts remains unknown. Purpose: To evaluate the graft maturity and patient–reported outcomes in patients who underwent double–bundle ACLR with or without ALSA. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 92 patients who underwent double–bundle ACLR between January 2016 and July 2019 were included in the present study—44 patients with isolated ACLR (ACLR group) and 48 patients with combined ACLR and ALSA (ALSA group). Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and patient–reported outcomes were prospectively collected. On postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at the 2–year follow–up, the signal–to–noise quotient (SNQ) values were separately calculated for 6 sections of the ACL graft, including the femoral intratunnel graft (FTG), intra–articular graft (IAG), and tibial intratunnel graft (TTG) of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and the posterolateral bundle (PLB). Superior graft maturity was usually indicated by lower SNQ values. Results: The rates of return to preinjury sports were 47.9% and 27.3% in the ALSA and ACLR groups, respectively (difference, 20.6% [95% CI, 1.3%-40%]; P = .042). The AMB demonstrated significantly lower SNQ values in the ALSA group than in the ACLR group (FTG, 7.04 ± 3.65 vs 9.44 ± 4.51 [P = .006]; IAG, 6.62 ± 4.19 vs 8.77 ± 5.92 [P = .046]; TTG, 6.93 ± 3.82 vs 8.75 ± 4.55 [P = .040]). The SNQ values were significantly lower in the ALSA group for 2 of the 3 sections of the PLB (IAG, 7.73 ± 4.61 vs 9.88 ± 5.61 [P = .047]; TTG, 5.88 ± 3.10 vs 8.57 ± 4.32 [P = .001]). Partial lateral meniscectomy was correlated with higher SNQ values of the TTG in the AMB (β = 0.27; P = .009) and the PLB (β = 0.25; P = .008), with both groups pooled. Higher body mass index, smaller ACL graft–Blumensaat line angles, larger AMB graft diameters, and lower postoperative Tegner scores were also associated with inferior maturity in specific regions of the ACL graft. Conclusion: A combination of ACLR and ALSA is a desirable option to improve the maturity of ACL grafts for patients who are young or expected to return to pivoting sports. Meanwhile, further investigations with higher levels of evidence and longer periods of follow–up are warranted.
ISSN:0363-5465
1552-3365
DOI:10.1177/03635465221092768