Shorter and sweeter: the 16-item version of the SRS questionnaire shows better structural validity than the 20-item version in young patients with spinal deformity

Purpose In patients with adult spinal deformity, it was previously shown that 16 of the non-management items of the SRS-instrument showed a better fit to the theoretical four-factor model (pain, function, self-image, mental health) than did all 20 items. Whether the same phenomenon is observed in da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine deformity 2022-09, Vol.10 (5), p.1055-1062
Main Authors: Mannion, A. F., Elfering, A., Fekete, T. F., Harding, I. J., Monticone, M., Obid, P., Niemeyer, T., Liljenqvist, U., Boss, A., Zimmermann, L., Vila-Casademunt, A., Sánchez Pérez-Grueso, F. J., Pizones, J., Pellisé, F., Richner-Wunderlin, S., Kleinstück, F. S., Obeid, I., Boissiere, L., Alanay, A., Bagó, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case Series
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose In patients with adult spinal deformity, it was previously shown that 16 of the non-management items of the SRS-instrument showed a better fit to the theoretical four-factor model (pain, function, self-image, mental health) than did all 20 items. Whether the same phenomenon is observed in data from younger (
ISSN:2212-134X
2212-1358
DOI:10.1007/s43390-022-00509-5