A Retrospective Observational Study of Anticoagulation Practices in Critically ill Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. AF precipitates thromboembolic (TE) events. International guidelines recommend long-term anticoagulation for AF patients dependent upon the risk of TE versus major bleeding events. The CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of intensive care medicine 2022-12, Vol.37 (12), p.1569-1579
Main Authors: Miller, NHC, Johnston, BW, Hampden-Martin, A, AAC, Waite, Waugh, V, Welters, ID
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. AF precipitates thromboembolic (TE) events. International guidelines recommend long-term anticoagulation for AF patients dependent upon the risk of TE versus major bleeding events. The CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores are used to calculate these risks, but have not been validated in intensive care. Little is known about the risk/benefit ratio of prescribing anticoagulation to patients with AF in the intensive care setting. Methods This observational study included patients who were admitted to intensive care and had AF episodes during admission. We aimed to 1) describe the anticoagulation strategies used in critically ill patients with AF, 2) determine the percentage of patients who received guideline-compliant anticoagulation and 3) compare anticoagulation strategies in patients with new onset AF (NOAF) and known AF. Demographic data was extracted from electronic health records. Therapeutic anticoagulation prescribed during AF episodes and outcomes were collected. CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were calculated and correlated with TE and bleeding events. Results The incidence of AF in our cohort was 13.8%. Anticoagulation was administered in 34.0% of patients. Anticoagulation use did not affect morbidity or mortality outcomes. Patients with pre-existing AF were anticoagulated more often compared to patients with NOAF. CHA2DS2VASc scores and TE events, and HAS-BLED scores and bleeding events did not correlate well. Conclusion AF is common in critical care. Current guidelines on anticoagulation in AF may not be directly transferable to the critical care setting.
ISSN:0885-0666
1525-1489
DOI:10.1177/08850666221092997