Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA)

The Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) have set standards in reporting outcomes after oesophagectomy. Reporting outcomes from selected high-volume centres or centralized national cancer programmes may not, however, be reflectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJS open 2021-05, Vol.5 (3)
Main Authors: Fergusson, J, Mosse, C, Cheah, S, Wright, T, Albadawi, F, Dingle, A, Cabalag, C, Ward, S, Johnson, M, Bassari, R, Buduhan, G, Vargas-Barato, F, Beltrán-García, TC, Gómez-Mayorga, J, Cortés, N, Pazdro, A, Eckardt, J, Nega, B, Gruetzmann, R, Krautz, C, Emons, G, Azizian, A, Ebeling, M, Donlon, N, Bianchini, S, Asti, E, Tsubosa, Y, Makuuchi, R, Mwachiro, M, Fekadu, A, Mwachiro, E, Ahmed, HA, Yunrong, T, Aik, HC, Lagarde, SM, van Workum, F, Ruurda, JP, van der Sluis, PC, Johnston, P, Young, M, Memon, AH, Wajid, A, Sarwar, MZ, Shehzadi, A, Raza, A, Noor, MA, da Silva, R, Matos, H, Braga, T, Stoica, B, Ciubotaru, C, Tomsa, R, Rifá, S, Rodicio Miravalles, JL, Turienzo, SA, Fernández Díaz, MJ, Magadán Álvarez, C, Pérez Sánchez, LE, Dzhendov, T, Rutegård, M, Sundbom, M, Mickael, C, Colucci, N, Yildirim, R, Hardwick, R, Afzal, Z, Mukherjee, D, Mukherjee, S, Young, R, Menon, V, McLaughlin, E, Koshy, R, Al Khyatt, W, McGregor, R, Saad, M, Di Maggio, F, McKay, S, Shetty, V, Sue Ling, H, Palser, T, Kordzadeh, A, Willem, J, Bouras, G, Singh, M, Ahmad, A, van Boxel, Gijs, Akbari, K, Sgromo, B, Ariyarathenam, A, Akhtar, K, Tamhankar, A, Walker, R, Abbassi, N, Ioannidi, L, Owera, A, Rashid, F, Jambulingam, P, Rosato, EL, Zheng, R, Singh, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Consensus
Esophageal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
Humans
Prospective Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) have set standards in reporting outcomes after oesophagectomy. Reporting outcomes from selected high-volume centres or centralized national cancer programmes may not, however, be reflective of the true global prevalence of complications. This study aimed to compare complication rates after oesophagectomy from these existing sources with those of an unselected international cohort from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA). The OGAA was a prospective multicentre cohort study coordinated by the West Midlands Research Collaborative, and included patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April and December 2018, with 90 days of follow-up. The OGAA study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. Comparisons with the ECCG and DUCA found differences in baseline demographics between the three cohorts, including age, ASA grade, and rates of chronic pulmonary disease. The OGAA had the lowest rates of neoadjuvant treatment (OGAA 75.1 per cent, ECCG 78.9 per cent, DUCA 93.5 per cent; P 
ISSN:2474-9842
2474-9842
DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010