Crosswalks between the Oxford hip and knee scores and the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments

To develop and validate bi-directional crosswalks between the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and HOOS-12 summary impact score, and between the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and KOOS-12 summary impact score. Data were sourced from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Patient-R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2022-04, Vol.30 (4), p.570-577
Main Authors: Soh, S-E., Harris, I.A., Cashman, K., Graves, S.E., Ackerman, I.N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Australia
Crosswalks
Hip arthroplasty
Hip replacement
Humans
Knee arthroplasty
Knee replacement
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Registries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To develop and validate bi-directional crosswalks between the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and HOOS-12 summary impact score, and between the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and KOOS-12 summary impact score. Data were sourced from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Program. Patients undergoing primary joint replacement for osteoarthritis who completed the OHS and HOOS-12 or OKS and KOOS-12 instruments were included in the analysis. An equipercentile method was used to create four crosswalks, with the distribution of scores smoothed using log-linear models prior to equating. Crosswalk validity was assessed through comparison of actual vs derived scores, Pearson correlation coefficients, root mean square errors (RMSE) and Bland-Altman plots. Paired OHS/HOOS-12 data and paired OKS/KOOS-12 data were available for 4,513 patients undergoing total hip replacement and 5,942 patients undergoing total knee replacement, respectively. Minimal differences were observed between actual and crosswalk-derived mean scores (actual OHS 27.55 vs derived OHS 27.56; actual HOOS-12 53.28 vs derived HOOS-12 53.31; actual OKS 27.34 vs derived OKS 27.34; actual KOOS-12 50.51 vs derived KOOS-12 50.58). High correlation was observed between actual and derived scores (Pearson's r for hip-specific instruments: 0.943–0.946; Pearson's r for knee-specific instruments: 0.925–0.931). Plotted actual vs mean derived scores also indicated robust concordance across the breadth of the instrument scales. These crosswalks provide close approximations of actual OHS, OKS, HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 scores, as indicated by multiple validation metrics. They offer a resource for clinicians, researchers and arthroplasty registries to support PROMs score conversion and data harmonisation efforts.
ISSN:1063-4584
1522-9653
DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.004