Loading…
In Vivo Comparison of Micro-Balloon Interventions (MBI) Advantage: A Retrospective Cohort Study of DEB-TACE Versus b-TACE and of SIRT Versus b-SIRT
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo the role of the micro-balloon by comparing trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) procedures performed with and without balloon micro-catheter (b-DEB-TACE and DEB-TACE/SIRT and b-SIRT) for the t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2022-03, Vol.45 (3), p.306-314 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo the role of the micro-balloon by comparing trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) procedures performed with and without balloon micro-catheter (b-DEB-TACE and DEB-TACE/SIRT and b-SIRT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods
The impact of a balloon micro-catheter on trans-arterial loco-regional treatment was analyzed using non-enhanced post-procedural cone-beam CT (Ne-CBCT) by comparing the attenuation values in the embolized area and the surrounding liver tissue before and after DEB-TACE versus b-DEB-TACE and by comparing 2D/3D dosimetry in single-photon emission computed tomography after SIRT versus b-SIRT, and by comparing the histological count of the beads following orthotopic liver transplantation in the DEB-TACE versus b-DEB-TACE subgroup.
Results
We treated 84 HCC patients using trans-arterial loco-regional therapy. Fifty-three patients (26 DEB-TACE and 27 b-DEB-TACE) were analyzed in the TACE group. Contrast, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were all significantly higher in b-DEB-TACE subgroup than DEB-TACE (182.33 HU [CI95% 160.3–273.5] vs. 124 HU [CI95% 80.6–163.6]; 8.3 [CI95% 5.7–10.1] vs. 4.5 [CI95% 3.7–6.0]; 6.9 [CI95% 4.3–7.8] vs. 3.1 [CI95% 2.2–5.0]
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0174-1551 1432-086X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00270-021-03035-5 |