Clinical outcomes of dabigatran use in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and weight >120 kg

Patients with obesity were underrepresented in studies evaluating the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study compared clinical outcomes in patients with NVAF and weighing >120 kg and ≤120 kg who were recei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Thrombosis research 2021-12, Vol.208, p.176-180
Main Authors: Coates, Jamie, Bitton, Emily, Hendje, Ashley, Delate, Thomas, Olson, Kari L., Knowles, Carla, Ly, Sara, Fink, Kristen M., Clark, Nathan P.
Format: Article
Language:eng
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Patients with obesity were underrepresented in studies evaluating the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study compared clinical outcomes in patients with NVAF and weighing >120 kg and ≤120 kg who were receiving dabigatran. This retrospective, matched, longitudinal cohort study included patients from three integrated healthcare delivery systems. Patients ≥18 years of age with NVAF were included if between September 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019 they received dabigatran. Patients >120 kg and ≤120 kg were matched up to 1:6 on age, sex, and CHA2DS2-VASc score. Data were extracted from administrative databases. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, clinically-relevant bleeding, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable regression analyses were performed. 777 and 3522 patients >120 kg and ≤120 kg, respectively, were matched. The >120 kg group tended to be younger with a higher burden of chronic disease. There was no difference between groups in the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.89–1.37) or individual components of the composite. A subanalysis of clinically-relevant bleeding identified that patients >120 kg were at a greater risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (AHR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.05). In patients with NVAF and >120 kg, dabigatran use was associated with a small increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding but no differences in stroke, mortality or clinically-relevant bleeding. These findings suggest that dabigatran use is reasonable in patients with NVAF and weight >120 kg. •DOAC use in patients >120 kg creates the potential for poor clinical outcomes•Real-world data on DOAC use in patients >120 kg are limited•Overall, dabigatran's outcomes were equivalent between patients ≤ & >120 kg•Patients >120 kg had small increased risk of gastrointestinal bleed•Dabigatran use in patients >120 kg is reasonable
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472