Loading…

Efficacy and safety of the addition of sitagliptin to treatment of youth with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on metformin without or with insulin

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin ± insulin. Study Design Data were pooled from two 54‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled studies of sitagliptin 100 mg daily or placebo added onto trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric diabetes 2022-03, Vol.23 (2), p.183-193
Main Authors: Jalaludin, Muhammad Yazid, Deeb, Asma, Zeitler, Philip, Garcia, Raymundo, Newfield, Ron S., Samoilova, Yulia, Rosario, Carmen A., Shehadeh, Naim, Saha, Chandan K., Zhang, Yilong, Zilli, Martina, Scherer, Lynn W., Lam, Raymond L. H., Golm, Gregory T., Engel, Samuel S., Kaufman, Keith D., Shankar, R. Ravi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin ± insulin. Study Design Data were pooled from two 54‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled studies of sitagliptin 100 mg daily or placebo added onto treatment of 10‐ to 17‐year‐old youth with T2D and inadequate glycemic control on metformin ± insulin. Participants (N = 220 randomized and treated) had HbA1c 6.5%–10% (7.0%–10% if on insulin), were overweight/obese at screening or diagnosis and negative for pancreatic autoantibodies. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 20. Results Treatment groups were well balanced at baseline (mean HbA1c = 8.0%, BMI = 30.9 kg/m2, age = 14.4 years [44.5% 1500 mg/day for 71.8% of participants; 15.0% of participants were on insulin therapy. At Week 20, LS mean changes from baseline (95% CI) in HbA1c for sitagliptin/metformin and placebo/metformin were −0.58% (−0.94, −0.22) and −0.09% (−0.43, 0.26), respectively; difference = −0.49% (−0.90, −0.09), p = 0.018; at Week 54 the LS mean (95% CI) changes were 0.35% (−0.48, 1.19) and 0.73% (−0.08, 1.54), respectively. No meaningful differences between the adverse event profiles of the treatment groups emerged through Week 54. Conclusions These results do not suggest that addition of sitagliptin to metformin provides durable improvement in glycemic control in youth with T2D. In this study, sitagliptin was generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to that reported in adults. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01472367, NCT01760447; EudraCT: 2011‐002529‐23/2014‐003583‐20, 2012‐004035‐23).
ISSN:1399-543X
1399-5448
DOI:10.1111/pedi.13282