Characterization of microplastics in indoor and ambient air in northern New Jersey

Airborne microplastics (MPs) could have negative impacts on human health and pollute water, soil, and sediment. This study explored the distributions, compositions, and morphology of airborne microplastics in the indoor and ambient air in New Jersey, United States. Microplastic fibers, films, and fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental research 2022-05, Vol.207, p.112142-112142, Article 112142
Main Authors: Yao, Ying, Glamoclija, Mihaela, Murphy, Ashley, Gao, Yuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis
Airborne microplastic
Ambient air
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Humans
Indoor fallout
Microplastics
New Jersey
Plastics
Raman
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Airborne microplastics (MPs) could have negative impacts on human health and pollute water, soil, and sediment. This study explored the distributions, compositions, and morphology of airborne microplastics in the indoor and ambient air in New Jersey, United States. Microplastic fibers, films, and fragments of Polystyrene (PS), Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Polyethyelene (PE), Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and Polypropylene (PP) were identified in office, hallway, classroom, and single-family house in this study. The deposition rates of synthetic fibers with length from 35 μm to 1000 μm were highest in the single-family house ((1.96 ± 1.09) × 104 fibers/m2/day) and lowest in the classroom ((6.20 ± 0.57) × 103 fibers/m2/day), suggesting that residential houses are a major source of microplastic fibers. However, for film-like plastics with surface areas ranging from 200 μm2 to 5000 μm2, a high deposition rate of (8.13 ± 2.17) × 103 films/m2/day was observed in the classroom, whereas the lowest deposition rate of (4.45 ± 0.27) × 103 films/m2/day was found in the hallway, probably because plastic films such as PE are intensively used in the classroom environments. The deposition rate of microplastics in the ambient air acquired on a building roof was only about 2–8% of the indoor deposition rates. The microplastics with similar textures but different sizes were identified in both total atmospheric deposition and particulate samples (PM2.5 and PM10), suggesting degradation from microplastics to nanoplastics. The main microplastics found in indoor air samples were PE fragments or fibers, different from those in the outdoor ambient air that were dominated by PVC fragments. These results unravel the properties of airborne microplastics in urban environments that are important to understanding their fate, transport, and potential health risks. •The airborne microplastics ambient deposition rate was 2–8% of that for indoor.•The main indoor airborne microplastics were polyethyelene fragments or fibers.•The main ambient airborne microplastics were polyvinyl chloride fragments.•Various sizes of similar microplastics in ambient air suggest physical weathering.
ISSN:0013-9351
1096-0953
DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112142