Loading…
A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps
Objective This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments. Methods The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source docume...
Saved in:
Published in: | Suicide & life-threatening behavior 2021-08, Vol.51 (4), p.767-774 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923 |
container_end_page | 774 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 767 |
container_title | Suicide & life-threatening behavior |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Workman, Don E. Bellanti, Dawn M. Kelber, Marija S. Beech, Erin H. Smolenski, Derek Bush, Nigel E. Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda Skopp, Nancy Otto, Jean L. Garvey Wilson, Abigail L. Morgan, Maria A. Ojha, Suman Belsher, Bradley E. |
description | Objective
This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments.
Methods
The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source document for research gaps, supplemented by an updated literature search. Institutional stakeholders rated the identified research gaps and ranked the gap categories. We used Q factor analysis to derive a list of the prioritized research gaps and category rankings.
Results
Thirty‐five research gaps were identified and prioritized. The highest rated research gap topic was lethal means safety interventions and their effectiveness in increasing safety behaviors and/or reducing suicide‐related outcomes. Research on the effectiveness of crisis response planning and several other non‐pharmacological interventions (e.g., implementation of cognitive‐behavioral therapy, technology‐based behavioral interventions, and applications of dialectical behavior therapy to non‐Borderline patients) were also rated highly by stakeholders.
Conclusions
This work generated a list of priorities for future suicide research as evaluated by Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs stakeholders. Our findings can help guide the efforts of suicide researchers and inform decisions about future research funding for suicide prevention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/sltb.12766 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551208274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2551208274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgCs7pxU9Q8CJCZ96WtMc5fIOCByd4C2maaEbXzjytUj-92erJgw-EhDy_BJ4_QucEz0isa6i7ckaoFOIATUjOWUpl9nqIJpgJlmLK-DE6AVjjWBTjCSoWCQzQ2Y3uvEl0o-sBPMRDlWyDb4Pv_HdstU3SugR6b3xlY8d-2mZ_GyxYHcx78qa3cIqOnK7Bnv3uU_Ryd7taPqTF0_3jclGkhjEu0jITMudSM01zl1tZYVqxiruSl5JjoR0lxGDDrHbRm8paSlnOXM7m2vCcsim6HP_dhvajt9CpjQdj61o3tu1B0fmcUJxRySO9-EPXbR_imDslmIgrk1FdjcqEFiBYp-LwGx0GRbDaBat2wap9sBGTEX_52g7_SPVcrG7GNz8qQntV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563656387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Workman, Don E. ; Bellanti, Dawn M. ; Kelber, Marija S. ; Beech, Erin H. ; Smolenski, Derek ; Bush, Nigel E. ; Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda ; Skopp, Nancy ; Otto, Jean L. ; Garvey Wilson, Abigail L. ; Morgan, Maria A. ; Ojha, Suman ; Belsher, Bradley E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Workman, Don E. ; Bellanti, Dawn M. ; Kelber, Marija S. ; Beech, Erin H. ; Smolenski, Derek ; Bush, Nigel E. ; Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda ; Skopp, Nancy ; Otto, Jean L. ; Garvey Wilson, Abigail L. ; Morgan, Maria A. ; Ojha, Suman ; Belsher, Bradley E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments.
Methods
The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source document for research gaps, supplemented by an updated literature search. Institutional stakeholders rated the identified research gaps and ranked the gap categories. We used Q factor analysis to derive a list of the prioritized research gaps and category rankings.
Results
Thirty‐five research gaps were identified and prioritized. The highest rated research gap topic was lethal means safety interventions and their effectiveness in increasing safety behaviors and/or reducing suicide‐related outcomes. Research on the effectiveness of crisis response planning and several other non‐pharmacological interventions (e.g., implementation of cognitive‐behavioral therapy, technology‐based behavioral interventions, and applications of dialectical behavior therapy to non‐Borderline patients) were also rated highly by stakeholders.
Conclusions
This work generated a list of priorities for future suicide research as evaluated by Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs stakeholders. Our findings can help guide the efforts of suicide researchers and inform decisions about future research funding for suicide prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-0234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-278X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior Modification ; Crisis Management ; Factor Analysis ; Stakeholders ; Suicide ; Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><ispartof>Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2021-08, Vol.51 (4), p.767-774</ispartof><rights>2021 American Association of Suicidology. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The American Association of Suicidology</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5338-2899 ; 0000-0003-4767-075X ; 0000-0003-2243-1170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsltb.12766$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsltb.12766$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Workman, Don E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellanti, Dawn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelber, Marija S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beech, Erin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolenski, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Nigel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skopp, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey Wilson, Abigail L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belsher, Bradley E.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps</title><title>Suicide & life-threatening behavior</title><description>Objective
This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments.
Methods
The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source document for research gaps, supplemented by an updated literature search. Institutional stakeholders rated the identified research gaps and ranked the gap categories. We used Q factor analysis to derive a list of the prioritized research gaps and category rankings.
Results
Thirty‐five research gaps were identified and prioritized. The highest rated research gap topic was lethal means safety interventions and their effectiveness in increasing safety behaviors and/or reducing suicide‐related outcomes. Research on the effectiveness of crisis response planning and several other non‐pharmacological interventions (e.g., implementation of cognitive‐behavioral therapy, technology‐based behavioral interventions, and applications of dialectical behavior therapy to non‐Borderline patients) were also rated highly by stakeholders.
Conclusions
This work generated a list of priorities for future suicide research as evaluated by Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs stakeholders. Our findings can help guide the efforts of suicide researchers and inform decisions about future research funding for suicide prevention.</description><subject>Behavior Modification</subject><subject>Crisis Management</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><issn>0363-0234</issn><issn>1943-278X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgCs7pxU9Q8CJCZ96WtMc5fIOCByd4C2maaEbXzjytUj-92erJgw-EhDy_BJ4_QucEz0isa6i7ckaoFOIATUjOWUpl9nqIJpgJlmLK-DE6AVjjWBTjCSoWCQzQ2Y3uvEl0o-sBPMRDlWyDb4Pv_HdstU3SugR6b3xlY8d-2mZ_GyxYHcx78qa3cIqOnK7Bnv3uU_Ryd7taPqTF0_3jclGkhjEu0jITMudSM01zl1tZYVqxiruSl5JjoR0lxGDDrHbRm8paSlnOXM7m2vCcsim6HP_dhvajt9CpjQdj61o3tu1B0fmcUJxRySO9-EPXbR_imDslmIgrk1FdjcqEFiBYp-LwGx0GRbDaBat2wap9sBGTEX_52g7_SPVcrG7GNz8qQntV</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Workman, Don E.</creator><creator>Bellanti, Dawn M.</creator><creator>Kelber, Marija S.</creator><creator>Beech, Erin H.</creator><creator>Smolenski, Derek</creator><creator>Bush, Nigel E.</creator><creator>Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda</creator><creator>Skopp, Nancy</creator><creator>Otto, Jean L.</creator><creator>Garvey Wilson, Abigail L.</creator><creator>Morgan, Maria A.</creator><creator>Ojha, Suman</creator><creator>Belsher, Bradley E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-2899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4767-075X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-1170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps</title><author>Workman, Don E. ; Bellanti, Dawn M. ; Kelber, Marija S. ; Beech, Erin H. ; Smolenski, Derek ; Bush, Nigel E. ; Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda ; Skopp, Nancy ; Otto, Jean L. ; Garvey Wilson, Abigail L. ; Morgan, Maria A. ; Ojha, Suman ; Belsher, Bradley E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior Modification</topic><topic>Crisis Management</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Suicides & suicide attempts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Workman, Don E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellanti, Dawn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelber, Marija S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beech, Erin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolenski, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Nigel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skopp, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey Wilson, Abigail L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Maria A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belsher, Bradley E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Suicide & life-threatening behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Workman, Don E.</au><au>Bellanti, Dawn M.</au><au>Kelber, Marija S.</au><au>Beech, Erin H.</au><au>Smolenski, Derek</au><au>Bush, Nigel E.</au><au>Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda</au><au>Skopp, Nancy</au><au>Otto, Jean L.</au><au>Garvey Wilson, Abigail L.</au><au>Morgan, Maria A.</au><au>Ojha, Suman</au><au>Belsher, Bradley E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps</atitle><jtitle>Suicide & life-threatening behavior</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>774</epage><pages>767-774</pages><issn>0363-0234</issn><eissn>1943-278X</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Objective
This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments.
Methods
The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source document for research gaps, supplemented by an updated literature search. Institutional stakeholders rated the identified research gaps and ranked the gap categories. We used Q factor analysis to derive a list of the prioritized research gaps and category rankings.
Results
Thirty‐five research gaps were identified and prioritized. The highest rated research gap topic was lethal means safety interventions and their effectiveness in increasing safety behaviors and/or reducing suicide‐related outcomes. Research on the effectiveness of crisis response planning and several other non‐pharmacological interventions (e.g., implementation of cognitive‐behavioral therapy, technology‐based behavioral interventions, and applications of dialectical behavior therapy to non‐Borderline patients) were also rated highly by stakeholders.
Conclusions
This work generated a list of priorities for future suicide research as evaluated by Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs stakeholders. Our findings can help guide the efforts of suicide researchers and inform decisions about future research funding for suicide prevention.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/sltb.12766</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-2899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4767-075X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-1170</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-0234 |
ispartof | Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2021-08, Vol.51 (4), p.767-774 |
issn | 0363-0234 1943-278X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2551208274 |
source | Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Behavior Modification Crisis Management Factor Analysis Stakeholders Suicide Suicides & suicide attempts |
title | A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T05%3A35%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20analysis%20and%20prioritization%20of%20suicide%20prevention%20research%20gaps&rft.jtitle=Suicide%20&%20life-threatening%20behavior&rft.au=Workman,%20Don%20E.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=774&rft.pages=767-774&rft.issn=0363-0234&rft.eissn=1943-278X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sltb.12766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551208274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-b867947a3a29f9e7d02d3d4fb4b7406af211c0c3eaf334cdee22393f935ac4923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563656387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |