A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps

Objective This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments. Methods The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source docume...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Suicide & life-threatening behavior 2021-08, Vol.51 (4), p.767-774
Main Authors: Workman, Don E., Bellanti, Dawn M., Kelber, Marija S., Beech, Erin H., Smolenski, Derek, Bush, Nigel E., Edwards‐Stewart, Amanda, Skopp, Nancy, Otto, Jean L., Garvey Wilson, Abigail L., Morgan, Maria A., Ojha, Suman, Belsher, Bradley E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior Modification
Crisis Management
Factor Analysis
Stakeholders
Suicide
Suicides & suicide attempts
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This study identified and prioritized research gaps for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense to inform future research investments. Methods The 2019 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide was the primary source document for research gaps, supplemented by an updated literature search. Institutional stakeholders rated the identified research gaps and ranked the gap categories. We used Q factor analysis to derive a list of the prioritized research gaps and category rankings. Results Thirty‐five research gaps were identified and prioritized. The highest rated research gap topic was lethal means safety interventions and their effectiveness in increasing safety behaviors and/or reducing suicide‐related outcomes. Research on the effectiveness of crisis response planning and several other non‐pharmacological interventions (e.g., implementation of cognitive‐behavioral therapy, technology‐based behavioral interventions, and applications of dialectical behavior therapy to non‐Borderline patients) were also rated highly by stakeholders. Conclusions This work generated a list of priorities for future suicide research as evaluated by Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs stakeholders. Our findings can help guide the efforts of suicide researchers and inform decisions about future research funding for suicide prevention.
ISSN:0363-0234
1943-278X
DOI:10.1111/sltb.12766