Breast cancer preoperative 18FDG-PET, overall survival prognostic separation compared with the lymph node ratio

Purpose To evaluate the overall survival prognostic value of preoperative 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer, as compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR). Methods Data were abstracted at a median follow-up 14.7 years from a retrospective cohort of 104 patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2021-07, Vol.28 (4), p.956-968
Main Authors: Vinh-Hung, Vincent, Everaert, Hendrik, Gorobets, Olena, Van Parijs, Hilde, Verfaillie, Guy, Vanhoeij, Marian, Storme, Guy, Fontaine, Christel, Lamote, Jan, Perrin, Justine, Farid, Karim, Nguyen, Nam P., Verschraegen, Claire, De Ridder, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cancer Research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Original Article
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To evaluate the overall survival prognostic value of preoperative 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer, as compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR). Methods Data were abstracted at a median follow-up 14.7 years from a retrospective cohort of 104 patients who underwent PET imaging before curative surgery. PET-Axillary|Sternal was classified as PET-positive if hypermetabolism was visualized in ipsilateral nodal axillary and/or sternal region, else as PET-negative. The differences of 15 years restricted mean survival time ∆ RMST according to PET and LNR were computed from Kaplan–Meier overall survival. The effect of PET and other patients' characteristics was analyzed through rankit normalization, which provides with Cox regression the Royston–Sauerbrei D measure of separation to compare the characteristics (0 indicating no prognostic value). Multivariate analysis of the normalized characteristics used stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion. Results In Kaplan–Meier analysis, LNR > 0.20 versus ≤ 0.20 showed ∆ RMST  = 3.4 years, P  = 0.003. PET-Axillary|Sternal positivity versus PET-negative showed a ∆ RMST  = 2.6 years, P  = 0.008. In Cox univariate analyses, LNR appeared as topmost prognostic separator, D  = 1.50, P  
ISSN:1340-6868
1880-4233
1880-4233
DOI:10.1007/s12282-021-01234-z