Randomized phase II clinical trial and biomarker analysis of paclitaxel plus epirubicin versus vinorelbine plus epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations

Purpose Resistance to paclitaxel remains a major challenge in treating breast cancer. Our preclinical study suggested that TEKT4 germline variations in breast cancer are associated with paclitaxel resistance and increase vinorelbine sensitivity. This clinical trial compared the efficacy of paclitaxe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2021, Vol.185 (2), p.371-380
Main Authors: Jiang, Yi-Zhou, Ge, Li-Ping, Jin, Xi, Fan, Lei, He, Min, Liu, Yin, Chen, Li, Zuo, Wen-Jia, Wu, Jiong, Liu, Guang-Yu, Di, Gen-Hong, Wang, Zhong-Hua, Yu, Ke-Da, Shao, Zhi-Ming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adjuvant treatment
Anthracyclines
Biomarkers
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer research
Chemotherapy
Clinical Trial
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Epidermal growth factor
Epirubicin
ErbB-2 protein
Health aspects
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mutation
Oncology
Paclitaxel
Patient compliance
Patients
Product development
Variation
Vinorelbine
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Resistance to paclitaxel remains a major challenge in treating breast cancer. Our preclinical study suggested that TEKT4 germline variations in breast cancer are associated with paclitaxel resistance and increase vinorelbine sensitivity. This clinical trial compared the efficacy of paclitaxel and vinorelbine in breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods In this open-label, single-center, phase II trial, female patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, stage IIB–IIIC breast cancer harboring TEKT4 germline variations were randomly assigned to the paclitaxel plus epirubicin (PE) or vinorelbine plus epirubicin (NE). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Targeted sequencing of a panel comprising 484 breast-related genes was performed to identify pCR-associated somatic mutations in each group. Results 91 Patients were assigned to PE (46 patients) or NE (45 patients). NE numerically increased the pCR rate (22.2% versus 8.7%, P  = 0.074). The ORRs for NE and PE were 82.2% and 76.1%, respectively. Interestingly, NE (15.4%) showed a significantly higher pCR rate than PE (0%) in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup ( P  = 0.044). Both regimens were well tolerated, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities reported at the expected levels. The biomarker analysis showed that UNC13D mutation predicted the pCR rate in NE ( P  = 0.011). Conclusions Although the primary endpoint was not met, NE might bring clinical benefit to HR-positive patients or patients simultaneously carrying UNC13D mutations.
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-020-05940-8